Books
Click images for more details
Josh Mar 29, 2017 Climate: Curry Climate: Mann Climate: RP Jnr Josh ;)
On this historic Brexit day the fun has not been confined to this continent. Over in the US they have had a 'hearing' on Climate Science with three of the world's most eminent climate scientists. Michael Mann was there too.
Josh Feb 6, 2017 Climate: Curry David Rose GWPF Josh Just about everywhere.
Story at Judy Curry's, Mail on Sunday, GWPF, WUWT,and Twitter of course.
Josh
Response to critiques: Climate scientists versus climate data by Judy Curry.
Instability of GHCN adjustment algorithm by Paul Matthews.
Science: One Damned Adjustment After Another? by Geoff Chambers
Josh Feb 25, 2015 Climate: Curry Climate: RP Jnr Josh Josh May 2, 2014 Climate: Curry Josh Apparently one single post by Judith Curry needs thirty alarmist posts to rebut it, so says Victor Venema. Yes, her arguments are that good and alarmism is that weak!
Josh Jul 29, 2011 Climate: Curry Josh 
From the post at Climate Etc - more name calling of skeptics, but this one is ok.
Bishop Hill Feb 23, 2011 Climate: Briffa Climate: CRU Climate: Curry Climate: IPCC Climate: Jones Climate: MWP Climate: Mann Climate: McIntyre Judith Curry has taken up Sir John Beddington's challenge to scientists to stand up and be counted in the battle against pseudoscience, with a long post on the subject of the Trick to Hide the Decline.
It is obvious that there has been deletion of adverse data in figures shown IPCC AR3 and AR4, and the 1999 WMO document. Not only is this misleading, but it is dishonest (I agree with Muller on this one). The authors defend themselves by stating that there has been no attempt to hide the divergence problem in the literature, and that the relevant paper was referenced. I infer then that there is something in the IPCC process or the authors’ interpretation of the IPCC process (i.e. don’t dilute the message) that corrupted the scientists into deleting the adverse data in these diagrams.
McIntyre’s analysis is sufficiently well documented that it is difficult to imagine that his analysis is incorrect in any significant way. If his analysis is incorrect, it should be refuted. I would like to know what the heck Mann, Briffa, Jones et al. were thinking when they did this and why they did this, and how they can defend this, although the emails provide pretty strong clues. Does the IPCC regard this as acceptable? I sure don’t.
It's pretty interesting to see Sir John Beddington, Sir Paul Nurse and rest of the scientific establishment, as well as most of the sci-bloggers in the UK, all lining themselves up on the side of pseudoscience on the Climategate issue and Hide the Decline in particular. I wonder how long they can sustain the charade that everything is well in UK climatology?
Bishop Hill Jan 29, 2011 Climate: Curry Judith Curry has been acclaimed as climatologist of the year at the post-normal science conference in Lisbon. Her prize - a Josh t-shirt!
Bishop Hill Nov 11, 2010 Climate: Curry Climate: RP Jnr Media Video of the Purdue University event featuring, RP Jnr, Judith Curry and Andy Revkin is now available.
WMV file is here.
Bishop Hill Nov 11, 2010 Climate: CRU Climate: Curry Climate: other A couple of dates for your diary. As several people have noted, Judith Curry is to give evidence on uncertainty and science policy at the US House of Representatives on 17th November. This is at 10:30am EST, which makes it 3:30pm GMT by reckoning.
Not on quite the same scale of importance, but David Holland has been speaking to BBC Norwich about Climategate and the programme will go out on Monday 15th November at 19:30. Details here.
Bishop Hill Nov 4, 2010 Climate: Curry There is an excellent profile of Judith Curry in the Georgia Tech alumni magazine.
“Scientists involved in the public debate mainly were trying to protect the UN treaty and were worried my post was going to make things worse. But that’s about policy and not about science. If that’s what was making these people tick, they’re part of the problem. That’s how we got in this trouble in the first place.”
Via WUWT
Bishop Hill Nov 4, 2010 Climate: Curry Climate: RP Jnr Climate: other Media Many will readers will know that there was a discussion last night between Judith Curry, Andy Revkin, Pielke Jnr and a Elizabeth McNie, a professor of political science and earth and atmospheric sciences.
Boilerplate.com, which looks like it's a newspaper blog, carries a brief report on the proceedings. It sounds as though much good sense was talked. Curry has already posted her speech, but there was also Revkin saying this:
Science is all about what is and the what ifs ... not telling you what to do.
Bishop Hill Nov 3, 2010 Climate: Curry Judith Curry looks at where the whole global warming thing came from. A must-read.
Bishop Hill Oct 23, 2010 Climate: Curry Journals There is a major profile of Judy Curry in Scientific American. Read it here.
Bishop Hill
WUWT is reporting that the current issue of SciAm has more sceptic friendly coverage as well. They'll be reviewing The Hockey Stick Illusion next!
