Seen elsewhere



Click images for more details

Recent posts
Recent comments

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace


Anothe load of horlicks from Matt McGrath at the BBC.

Aug 27, 2014 at 9:00 AM | Registered CommenterPhillip Bratby

I see Richard Betts has a feature on WUWT.

A Lead Author of IPCC AR5 Downplays Importance of Climate Models

Aug 26, 2014 at 9:50 PM | Unregistered CommenterSandyS

SandyS - thanks, Today visited Archaeolink, but THE MUSEUM WHICH EXPLAINS ANCIENT RUINS
.see that's what happens when you put the green lunatics in charge. They spend all the money on green gimmicks like the ever problamatic earthroofs. so suck away £millions oftaxpayer subsidies and then go bankrupt.
same old story the Doncaster eco-centre
I'll start a list in the Discussion thread

.. my framework is neolithic sites ie 3500-5000 years old, not to be confused with Pictish stones which are only 1500-1200 years old. Although I have visted many Pictish sites over the last 4 days.

Aug 26, 2014 at 6:48 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

Where Is This Handcart Going?

Every aspect of humanity is being held, *to blame* for, "harm to the environment ". It reaches even to reproduction, particularily Assisted Reproductive Technologies (aka fertility treatment ) as, "the ethics of offering reproductive services against its overall harm to the environment makes unregulated ARTs unjustified".

The premise is that ART (and presumably natural occurrences) can produce multiple births which add to world wide carbon emissions. The ethicist solution is carbon capping! Human life and hopes reduced to units of carbon.

I haven't read beyond the extract, this scares me enough.

Aug 26, 2014 at 5:17 PM | Unregistered CommenterNicholas

Another report from Dellers:

Australian Bureau of Meteorology Accused of Criminally Adjusted Global Warming

"The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has been caught red-handed manipulating temperature data to show "global warming" where none actually exists.

At Amberley, Queensland, for example, the data at a weather station showing 1 degree Celsius cooling per century was "homogenized" (adjusted) by the Bureau so that it instead showed a 2.5 degrees warming per century.
At Rutherglen, Victoria, a cooling trend of -0.35 degrees C per century was magically transformed at the stroke of an Australian meteorologist's pen into a warming trend of 1.73 degrees C per century.
Last year, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology made headlines in the liberal media by claiming that 2013 was Australia's hottest year on record. This prompted Australia's alarmist-in-chief Tim Flannery - an English literature graduate who later went on to earn his scientific credentials with a PhD in palaeontology, digging up ancient kangaroo bones - to observe that global warming in Australia was "like climate change on steroids."
But we now know, thanks to research by Australian scientist Jennifer Marohasy, that the hysteria this story generated was based on fabrications and lies."

Aug 26, 2014 at 3:27 PM | Registered CommenterRobert Christopher

Grumpy, his position on renewables is that he wants to sell energy to everyone else. He has no particular green agenda, he'll sell any sort of energy he can get his white-knuckled hands on, and sees renewables as just another natural resource to be whored off to the highest bidder.

Aug 26, 2014 at 8:55 AM | Unregistered CommenterTheBigYinJames

Me too Grumpy. It's quite possible we're about to be left stateless, with absolutely no say.

Aug 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM | Unregistered CommenterTheBigYinJames

The Scotch part of me says don't do something you might regret - the English part says 'bugger off, then'.

Aug 25, 2014 at 11:33 PM | Registered Commenterjamesp

Being English living in England, I feel mightily peeved that I have no say in whether Scotland should be independent. I imagine there must be plenty of Scots living in England who also have no say. It does affect us all, after all.

Aug 25, 2014 at 9:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterGrumpy

Listening to the debate between Salmond and Darling, I am intruiged by the discussion on the income from North Sea Oil and Gas. For someone so very enthusiastic for renewable energy, Salmond is very keen on the income from fossil fuels to bolster Scottish public services.

The discussion has moved on now, but perhaps a member of the audience might ask him to clarify his position......

Aug 25, 2014 at 9:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterGrumpy

PostCreate a New Post

Enter your information below to create a new post.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>