Click images for more details



Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« CRUTEM code still not fixed | Main | TV times »

Purdue climate confab

Video of the Purdue University event featuring, RP Jnr, Judith Curry and Andy Revkin is now available.

WMV file is here.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (12)

Guide to talk:

JC starts her speech - ~44 min

JC comments - start at 1 h 10 min

You could listen to Andy Revkin somewhere in there that James Hansen is a grandfather.

Climate science sure is funny this way. Steve McIntyre cannot say anything because he is 'only a statistician' but all that qualifies Hansen is his 'grandfatherliness'. Heh.

Nov 11, 2010 at 5:34 PM | Unregistered CommenterShub

Stream is so slow....

Nov 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM | Unregistered CommenterRobinson

"Open it up. Let everybody have a look at it and lets see if we can collectively do a good job".


Nov 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM | Unregistered CommenterShub

Link doesn't play on my imac. Anyone else having joy?

Nov 11, 2010 at 7:22 PM | Unregistered CommenterStuck-record

It's playing, but stopping every 5-20 seconds for me. I'll try again after the rush has subsided.

Nov 11, 2010 at 7:54 PM | Unregistered Commenterjim

Shub - quite! ..."Steve McIntyre cannot say anything because he is 'only a statistician'"... What tickles me about this type of comment is AFAICS the whole corpus of climate work is built on statistics. You know, complicated stuff like "this year is hotter than that year" or "the rate of warming/dying/drowning/funding/whatever is unprecendented" etc etc. The only person that comment reflects on is the person making it, and it translates to "I am so incompetent to commentate on any scientific matters that I'm not even aware of it"....On second thoughts - it also reflects on anyone who hears it without bursting out laughing! :-)

Nov 11, 2010 at 8:13 PM | Unregistered Commenternot banned yet

Today of all days we should remember what danger lies in ideology. These three have made no small contribution against the dogma of CAGW while simultaneously supporting the scientific method.

Nov 11, 2010 at 9:56 PM | Unregistered Commentersimpleseekeraftertruth

Moderator Elizabeth called the panelists her "dream team" and then proceeded to lay out her view of the world.

The speakers did a good job, each from his or her particular perspective. Good discussion!

However, Elizabeth's slant got precious little support. The dream team was a bit of a nightmare for her, I thought.

Nov 11, 2010 at 9:57 PM | Unregistered CommenterPolitical Junkie

Got it this time. Three reasonable, informed people making insightful statements, with a calm, civil question period to follow. No gouging, mud-wrestling or even name-calling. This one's never going to get picked up by the networks.

Nov 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM | Unregistered Commenterjim

Right click on it, bring up properties and change the bandwidth right down. You'll get a bad picture, but the audio will be fine.

Nov 12, 2010 at 1:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterRobinson

The wicked problem intro is very powerful.

Nov 12, 2010 at 11:38 AM | Unregistered CommenterLuke Warmer

You can use vlc media player to stream and convert this video into a proper video file.
(open source, multi platform, 150million+ downloads)

I though JCurry's attacks on climate scientists' tribalism were great.

Nov 13, 2010 at 1:31 PM | Unregistered Commenterphinniethewoo

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>