Unthreaded
Free speech: discuss RoP etc openly - a Q GC avoided answering.
Jun 1, 2018 at 11:13 PM | Pcar
What is RoP etc openly?
golf charlie
unless jury "locked up" the jurors can be influenced by everything they encounter.
Jun 1, 2018 at 8:07 PM | Pcar
It is cheaper for Taxpayers to lock-up Tommy Robinson than every Jury in every trial that he tries to disrupt, having been warned not to. This is not the way UK Law works, but Tommy Robinson believes he is a Social Justice Warrior
As a repeat offender, should there be a special Law for Tommy Robinson, or has UK Law demonstrated that it is not an ass?
stewgreen made an ass of himself last week, believing that Tommy Robinson's geographical location was a significant Legal Issue. Are you sure a Court Trial is "over" for the purpose of Contempt of Court, when the Jury has finished hearing evidence?
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/jun/09/jurors-suspended-jail-terms-serious-contempt-court
golf charlie
The week that was. A lesson in Free Speech.
There is a link here for more information https://saveyourinternet.eu/
Free speech: discuss RoP etc openly - a Q GC avoided answering.
Pcar
Yes Tommy Robinson deserves access to fair and impartial justice just as much as the Muslim paedophiles do.
Mailman
So other parts of the judgement could similarly be unsound.
Jun 1, 2018 at 3:57 PM | stewgreen
Do you consider that Tommy Robinson has an entitlement to better, equal or worse respect and treatment for Contempt of Court, than the Judge, Jury, Court Officers, Lawyers, CPS, Defendants and Witnesses in any of the trials he has disrupted?
golf charlie
– Greater use of National Service for habitual offenders;
Jun 1, 2018 at 8:46 PM | Mark Hodgson
Tommy Robinson is ready to take on the whole world, once he gets out of prison.
He could cause some difficulties within our Politically Correct Military, if he accidentally, but enthusiastically misread instructions on daily square bashing
golf charlie
Mr Hodgson: well… no. But you were discussing one particular group (many of whose aims may well be supported by more than you might realise), whereas I was referring to a far broader general population.
Radical Rodent
Ravishing Rattie
Did you post before reading my recent one or in response to it?
If you don't think that list of policies are far-right, then we're worlds apart.
Mark Hodgson
A very good definition of far-right is circulating: anyone who is NOT far-left.
Radical Rodent
@Mark Hodgson, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:52 PM
The policies are not Far-Right, they are Anti Islam.
Were 1600s anti-catholic/protestant far-right?
They're anti-islam stance is due to islam's "kill all infidels" teaching. There is no anti Jew, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, prod/cath, atheist policy as they do not want to murder others.
Britain First's economic policies are Left protectionist/isolationist
Open your eyes.