Unthreaded
A 25 year delay
So that suggests that what temperature we got in 1993 was set in 1968
That if CO2 had not increased 1993 would be similar to 1968
stewgreen
So @EM you don't accept that any warming comes from us coming out of the last ice age ?
stewgreen
@stewgreen
Thanks for GWPF & Booker urls
Pcar
@Uibhist a Tuath, Oct 14, 2018 at 11:08 AM
+1 Not mentioned on BBC QT was significant.
Pre Broadcast Wonder if Global Warming will come up
Pcar
Stewgreen
There is a lag of about 25 years before most of the warming effect of any CO2 concentration shows in the temperatures
The 1C we have now is the price of the CO2 released up to 1993.
The CO2 released between 1993 and the present will produce a rise of 1.6C about 2043.
If we had stabilised at the 1993 level, 360ppm, we would be 0.6C cooler than we are today.
We are following a path about halfway between RCP6.0 and RCP8.5. I f we had followed RCP 8.5 I estimate that we would now be at 425ppm instead of 400ppm and would be 0.25C warmer.
Entropic man
icymi
It's National Hate Crime Awareness Week
No doubt we'll all be regaled by extra content from the usual suspects.
tomo
Lindzen GWPF 2018 video
..for new stuff , Twitter is the best search tool
stewgreen
@Brent Hargreaves, Oct 14, 2018 at 11:01 AM
Kudos to UAH for admitting error. imho admitting errors/mistakes is a sign of strength & honesty, not weakness.
Pcar
"Nobody outside takes the sceptics seriously any more"
#1 Every taxpayers view should be taken seriously
.. you can't just say cough up the cash
eg Metrolib Anti-Brexiteers lost the referendum, so it is appropriate than concessions are made to them in other policies
And around my area almost everyone except Guardian readers is a sceptic
More people are aware that the MetroLib media push "fantasyland", than ever
stewgreen
@EM
RCPs are about sources + sinks?
Care to explain the sources and sinks of CO2 as observed by OCO-2 ?
Thought not