Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« Ross Clark on winter resilience | Main | Richard Smith on peer review »
Thursday
Dec302010

Haunting the Library

One of my regular email correspondents has started a blog. If the quality of the stories I've been fed in the past is anything to go by, Haunting the Library may well be one to watch.

I enjoyed this look back to an extraordinarily precise Hadley Centre prediction from 2003 that Scotland was going to suffer from [up to] 89% less snowfall. Even funnier is WWF's conclusion that this would make Scotland uninhabitable.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (12)

It looks interesting, especially Mark Lynsa predicting no Snow, in his book High Tide back in 2004.

Maybe you should have a seperate list on your blog roll,

for all the blogs that have been started by readers of Bishop Hill

Ie
Haunting the Library,
Climate Lessons...
etc

and don't forget mine!

www.realclimategate.org

;)

Dec 30, 2010 at 9:07 AM | Unregistered CommenterBarry Woods

Lol. We all follow the Bish! Hundreds of little bishops now, running around the internet.

Thanks for linking to my blog. I'll be back!

Dec 30, 2010 at 10:06 AM | Unregistered CommenterHauntingtheLibrary

Took a look and put it in my favourites straight away. Thanks for the link, Y'r Grace.

Dec 30, 2010 at 10:09 AM | Unregistered CommenterJohn in France

Thanks!

Dec 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterBarry Woods

Poor Monbiot is probably sitting right now, tearing out his hair thinking "Oh my God, they are procreating!"

Dec 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterH

H

George's flash-troll email alert list will be getting longer and more varied again.

Dec 30, 2010 at 7:41 PM | Unregistered CommenterBBD

o/t but Donna has a point: http://nofrakkingconsensus.wordpress.com/2010/12/30/world-wildlife-fund-infiltrates-uk-government/

Dec 30, 2010 at 7:46 PM | Unregistered CommenterDBD

DBD?

Dec 30, 2010 at 8:07 PM | Unregistered CommenterShub

I followed the link and read the entry. In it, he made up a quote, and implied something that wasn't in the article. And then you repeated his erroneous assertion.

The 89% value was the high end of a range, not a precise prediction. This is exactly what makes global warming skeptics - like me - look bad. Falsifying quotes, and then criticizing them. Thanks.

Dec 30, 2010 at 9:06 PM | Unregistered CommenterMarkB

MarkB

I take your point about the number range. I thought I'd corrected that shortly after the post went up, but clearly not.

What is the quote you are saying is made up?

Dec 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM | Registered CommenterBishop Hill

Shub

If you are asking what I think you are, then no, I am not DBD.

It is a bit hard on the eyeball, isn't it?

Dec 30, 2010 at 10:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterBBD

I am pleased that someone has the time to collect together all the dud predictions made by the AGW industry since it started its scare back in the 70s. There must be reams of material out there in Googleland. It's time for the climate soothsayers to answer for the failed predictions we paid them for. Why is there still a thriving Scottish ski industry, where the feck are my warm, dry summers?...I want to know.

I wonder if the 5 Scottish ski centres have data for the number of ski days available for each season since 1979. Certainly for the past 5 years the centres have been opening earlier and staying open longer than they had been since I started using them in 1980. Past 4 years have been fabulous, this year shaping up to be even better than previous.

Dec 30, 2010 at 10:08 PM | Unregistered CommenterJ Wade

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>