Feb 27, 2018 at 9:08 AM | Mark Hodgson

They have a Consensus. Therefore they do not need Science, or evidence to support their Consensus. CO2 was deemed guilty, without trial or evidence.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sus_law

The power to act on "sus" was found in part of section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824, which provided that:

"every suspected person or reputed thief, frequenting any river, canal, or navigable stream, dock, or basin, or any quay, wharf, or warehouse near or adjoining thereto, or any street, highway, or avenue leading thereto, or any place of public resort, or any avenue leading thereto, or any street, or any highway or any place adjacent to a street or highway; with intent to commit an arrestable offence" ..... "shall be deemed a rogue and vagabond" and would be guilty of an offence, and be liable to be imprisoned for up to three months. This effectively permitted the police to stop and search, and even arrest, anyone found in a public place on the grounds that they suspected that they might intend to commit an offence.

Carbon capture and storage is imprisonment without trial. Carbon dioxide doesn't even wear a baseball cap, underneath a hoodie, and loiter with intent to be offensive.

This article:

"King penguins face warming challenge" on the BBC website

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43204108

Led me to a link to the journal Nature Climate Change, which seems to be a spin-off of Nature. This is from their website:

"Aims
Understanding the Earth's changing climate, and its consequences, is a scientific challenge of enormous importance to society. Nature Climate Change is a monthly journal dedicated to publishing the most significant and cutting-edge research on the nature, underlying causes or impacts of global climate change and its implications for the economy, policy and the world at large.

Nature Climate Change publishes original research across the natural and social sciences and strives to synthesize interdisciplinary research. The journal follows the standards for high-quality science set by all Nature-branded journals and is committed to publishing top-tier original research in all areas relating to climate change through a fair and rigorous review process, access to a broad readership, high standards of copy editing and production, rapid publication and independence from academic societies and others with vested interests.

Scope
In addition to publishing original research, Nature Climate Change provides a forum for discussion among leading experts through the publication of opinion, analysis and review articles. It also highlights the most important developments in the field through Research Highlights and publishes original reporting from renowned science journalists in the form of feature articles.

Topics covered in the journal include:

Adaptation
Anthropology
Atmospheric science
Biochemistry
Communication
Cryospheric science
Ecology
Economics
Energy
Ethics
Geography
Health
Hydrology
Impacts and vulnerability
Mitigation
Modelling
Oceanography
Palaeoclimate*
Philosophy
Policy and governance
Political science
Psychology
Sociology
Sustainability and development
*Nature Climate Change will publish cutting-edge research on the science of contemporary climate change, its impacts, and the wider implications for the economy, society and policy. Thus, while we certainly appreciate the importance of palaeoclimate research in its own right, we can only consider for publication palaeoclimate studies that shed significant new light on the nature, underlying causes or impacts of current climate change."

Looks like they've made their mind up - I don't see that they say they'll publish anything that questions current theories of climate change or which proposes alternative views. That could be just my interpretation, but when you look at recent articles published, they do all seem to have a rather one-sided theme...See here:

https://www.nature.com/nclimate/

How Australia's BOM spreads Global Warming, when none actually exists.

http://joannenova.com.au/2018/02/bourke-how-1km-of-land-clearing-can-warm-a-million-square-miles/

Trump needs to reduce the NRA's demands for weapons, but Scott Pruitt is deweaponising the US EPA

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/02/26/quote-of-the-week-an-amazing-and-encouraging-statement-from-epas-scott-pruitt/

Scott Pruitt: "Busy year. And it was great to be at CPAC about two weeks after having been sworn in last year. And I talked last year about the future ain’t what it used to be, that Yogi Berra quote that I cited about the change that was gonna take place at the agency and I think we’ve been about that change the last year. Focusing on rule of law, restoring process and order, making sure that we engage in cooperative federalism as we engage in regulation."

"But the key to me is that weaponization of the agency that took place in the Obama administration, where the agency was used to pick winners and losers. Those days are over."

Here is the general synopsis, brought to you by Piers Corbyn

https://order-order.com/2018/02/26/piers-corbyn-bbc-globalist-soros-nazi-eu-4th-reich-fake-news-filth/

Meanwhile - back in the day when there was fun in the Oval Office Monica reprises events ...Maybe she want to write a book too .. .just like Hillary ... Could take the heat off Trumpy Here