Click images for more details



Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« French try to remove EU commitment to free trade | Main | Libertarians take their pep pills »

There is no consensus, anyway (redux)

Roger Pielke Snr has a new post up, in which he documents all the scientific papers which question the robustness of the surface temperature record. There are a lot of them.

None of these are cited by the IPCC because they conflict with the need to obtain a particular result. Pielke is quite straightforward about this - it's bias. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (3)

"Pielke is quite straightforward about this - it's bias. "

Not that Pielke is biased.
Jun 21, 2007 at 8:55 AM | Unregistered CommenterFrank O'Dwyer
He doesn't appear on the Wikipedia list of global warming skeptics.

The other point is that he is writing an opinion column on his blog. Jones was writing a scientific paper. There's a difference.
Jun 21, 2007 at 6:46 PM | Registered CommenterBishop Hill
But you miss the point Bishop. Pielke is biased because he doesn't accept the consensus. That's what bias means now, giving time to the truth about global warming. To be unbiased, you simply have to follow the party line.
Jul 7, 2007 at 3:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterJohn Nicklin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>