Buy the book

"...a rattling good detective story and a detailed and brilliant piece of science writing."

Matt Ridley, The Spectator

Read the reviews.

Order now:

Get signed copies here (USA).

 

How I uncovered a plot to greenify the BBC's output.

See details here.

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Twitter
More about me

Bishop Hill is not a bishop. He's not actually called Hill either. He is an Englishman who lives in rural Scotland.

Bishop Hill's Constitution for the UK
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Login
Powered by Squarespace
« Sceptics win a round of the climate debate | Main | That 800 year lag »
Friday
Mar162007

Carbon dioxide removal

A commenter at Tim Worstall reminds me of a cunning masterplan I developed in a moment of idleness some years ago. If the problem is that a load of carbon stored in an inert form under the ground has been converted to CO2, then the sensible solution is to get it back into an inert form again. Luis Enrique, puts it thusly:

 It would appear to (ignorant) me that a good way of reducing atmospheric C02 would be to replicate the process of how it got underground - i.e. growing lots of trees, cutting them down and burying them as landfill and growing more. repeat. Which is kind of why I no longer care about buying paper from managed forests then chucking it in the bin. Am I making an error here?

I must say this looks flawless to me. Maybe we don't need send our economy back to the dark ages.

So it's OK! We're not doomed after all! 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (1)

Yeah, toss them down old coal mines.
Mar 16, 2007 at 11:46 PM | Unregistered Commenterdearieme

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>