Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Unthreaded

Bishop Hill,

Is there anything happening in the background as far as updates / assessments of the police investigation of the release of the CRU emails?

John

Sep 22, 2010 at 2:44 PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn Whitman

L'Académie des Sciences has issued a press release after all.

http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/09/veil-lifted-on-french-academy-de.html

Sep 21, 2010 at 10:30 PM | Unregistered CommenterDreadnought

@ ZedsDeadBed

Just so all the information is spread around....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z00L2uNAFw8

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM | Unregistered CommenterRoss H

Poor old Moonbat is sounding very down in the mouth over at the Gruniad:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/sep/20/climate-change-negotiations-failure

Only a thoroughly heartless person could fail to be moved by such despondency (snigger).

Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM | Unregistered CommenterTurning Tide

Monseigneur

The French Académie des Sciences debate on Climate Science is taking place today. Closed sesssion, no communication to the Press. Speakers had to deliver their submissions, in confidence, by the end of August. Inside sources say the aim is to identify what is consensus and what is debateable.

http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2010/09/18/climat-debat-a-huis-clos-a-l-academie-des-sciences_1412854_3244.html

Sep 20, 2010 at 3:05 PM | Unregistered CommenterDreadnought

Well I never, a completely meaningless answer from Amazon re the recategorising of GW books. No further comment allowed from me apparently

"Thank you for contacting Amazon.co.uk.

At Amazon.co.uk, we passionately believe in freedom of expression and providing our customers with the broadest possible selection.

The Amazon Bestsellers calculation is based on Amazon.co.uk sales and is updated hourly to reflect recent and historical sales of every item sold on Amazon.co.uk.

While the Amazon Bestsellers list is a good indicator of how well a product is selling overall, it doesn't always indicate how well an item is selling among other similar items. Category and subcategory bestseller lists were created to highlight an item's rank in the categories or subcategories where it really stands out. We choose a few of the most popular subcategories in which the item has a high ranking in relation to other items in that subcategory, and showcase the item's rank on the product page. As with the main Amazon Bestsellers list, these category rankings are based on Amazon.co.uk sales and are updated hourly.

We value all feedback from our customers, and I thank you again for taking the time to send us your comments. Although we won't be able to comment further on this topic, we hope you'll allow us to continue to serve you. I hope this information is helpful.

Thank you for your interest in Amazon.co.uk.


Stephen Lourdes
Executive Customer Relations
Amazon.co.uk
http://www.amazon.co.uk

Sep 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM | Unregistered CommenterMessenger

Bish, would you like me to copy and paste the Willie Soon opinion piece from yesterdays South China Morning Post. I’m not sure how we stand as its behind a pay wall (4500 words ish snip me if you wish)

Sep 18, 2010 at 5:33 PM | Unregistered Commentermartyn

Willie Soon
Sep 17, 2010

Hot air
Is carbon dioxide really the monster driving climate change? If not, maybe we should prepare for a colder world.


In my 20-plus years of studying carbon dioxide and global warming, I have found that hypothetical scares often come before any realities or factual presentations. Horror stories about rising seas inundating land, cities and wildlife, super typhoons and hurricanes, and epic "mega droughts" lasting a decade or longer are all promoted as devastating results of global warming caused by the rising levels of carbon dioxide, according to reports and scientists associated with the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
But will any of these scary scenarios about the carbon dioxide monster prove true for Hong Kong?

My recent seminar at the University of Hong Kong's Department of Earth Sciences offered this simple answer: No. Objective science informs us that the so-called "consensus viewpoints" offered by the IPCC - about man-made carbon dioxide being the dominant factor in climate change - is primarily a political conclusion, and not likely a scientifically accurate one..........

http://www.scmp.com/portal/site/SCMP/menuitem.2af62ecb329d3d7733492d9253a0a0a0/?vgnextoid=694fe125a8a1b210VgnVCM100000360a0a0aRCRD&ss=Hong+Kong&s=News

Sep 17, 2010 at 7:32 PM | Unregistered Commentermartyn

Re-branding Alert!

Global Warming > Climate Change > Climate Disruption

Bit like Windscale > Sellafield

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/16/white-house-global-warming-global-climate-disruption/

Grasping at straws?

Sep 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM | Unregistered CommenterKeith in Ireland

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2010/sep/16/britain-leadership-climate-change?showallcomments=true#end-of-comments

Ed Millionpound leads the Labour party into the wastelands of insignificance.

Sep 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM | Unregistered CommenterLord Beaverbrook

PostCreate a New Post

Enter your information below to create a new post.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>