Unthreaded
@stewgreen, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:37 AM
Midnight news BBC said the Muslim cost case was subject to court reporting restrictions and implied the newspapers had broken them.
Thanks.
Good brave work by The Times, DM et al. Shameful BBC.
Court has decided child should now stay with relatives.
Good news, without The Times, DM et al exposure - excluding BBC - probably would not have happened.
I hope the young girl does not suffer any long term damage from the dystopian child abuse Labour's Tower Hamlets Council inflicted on her.
Midnight news BBC said the Muslim foster case was subject to court reporting restrictions and implied the newspapers had broken them.
Court has decided child should now stay with relatives.
Fox News "controversial channel" - here we go again; Left/BBC/Green prefixes anything they dislike as "controversial" even if majority approve or have no opinion.
The bias and lack of News increases every day - C4 is equally bad. Both News are not News, they are "victim" whine documentaries.
.
I want the News, not the personal experiences - which are never about eg "CapFX insolvent - 500 FX Traders lose jobs" former Billingsgate Market fish monger Wayne tells us how his family of six will lose their home.
.
Have BBC classed Brexit as "controversial"?
Have BBC ever pushed Gov't expenditure is too high, taxes are too high. When are you, minister, going to reduce and allow all taxpayers to keep more of what they earn?
BTW we have seen time and time again
that given ample warning of heavy rain, authorities have failed to lower dam and waterway levels to prepare, and then have got caught out by water coming over the top.
@Pcar The BBC article implies they found her story cos she was on Asian Network discussion this morning
In fact she had a big article in the Guardian this morning
and is a well know Islamic activist working for a Muslim PR charity, someone mentioned a Soros connection.
There's a lot in her twitter history
26 Aug 2016 Esmat Jeraj tells @jonathansamuels items like burkinis empower women and isn't oppressive #SkyNewsTonight
(same day she called people "coloured" on Sky)
BBC Censorship by omission:
Don't report The Times evil child abuse by Tower Hamlets Council article as reported here
Instead publish a pro multi-culti article:
Here, we speak to a Muslim woman whose family has been fostering children from all religions for 25 years.
http://c2n.me/3NjYFSQ.jpg
A "Antifa" K, Balanced journalism? As before: not TV 10PM only, entire BBC output. - bold as you always ignore this.
No doubt the usual misinterpretation, misrepresentation, distortion or even lies will be forthcoming - or silence.
.
Hey AK,
Hows the graphite burning with no accelerants going?
@Radical +1 Spot on
@the informed
The news team reported on the terrible incident of gouging. But they actually demonstrate exactly why prices need to go up when demand goes up...
You're not alone, Forbes should apologise and re-instate.
I don't how Alan can watch Newsfotainment; I just passed the opening of ITV News at 10 an Storm Harvey is there big narrative
"Before Climate Change this was a one in 2,000 year event"
...that's freaking guess cos you don't have 2,000 years of robust data
Then they wheel on Richard Allen of the Met Office
"Well we are not sure that these events are more common, but we are sure they are stronger ..cos with the air getting warmer it picks up more moisture so heavier rain"
Em seems NO to me
#1 The hurricane was not stronger than previous hurricanes
#2 Five minutes ago they gave the reason for the heavy rain as ..'cos the wind is slower the rain clouds don't move quickly, rather they dump all their rain over the same spot.'
The report had a very long narrative about a stranded black man who was having an epileptic fit , and cops were too busy to move him to a hospital.
..Hmm people have epileptic fits every day ..mostly they don't need medical intervention.
I half listened to a discussion on BBC 4 discussing merits of fostering locally or by ethnicity. Reference was made to the Tower Hamlets case to explain why topic was being discussed. Specific cases involving children and still under court jurisdiction would never be discussed. Would have paid more attention if I had known the case was to constitute further BBC bashing. I suspect that if the BBC had broken what it considered a moral or legal law and discussed the specific case, it would now be undergoing stick here for that ("shameful BBC").