Jun 5, 2018 at 12:14 AM | stewgreen
Can I refer you to my post here? Jun 5, 2018 at 1:36 AM | golf charlie

Delingpole has confirmed the legal fact that you are consistently wrong with your legal facts.

"Golf I have never read Guido's page on the topic, (It's snarly & nasty from the first glance) , but I was watching him tweet"

So you have made an idiot of yourself, because you didn't read something, but attacked me because of your assumptions about what might have been written by somebody else?

stewgreen, you ARE a Legal Liability (and your style is snarly & nasty from the first and second glances)

Have you seen Guido's cartoon now? It won't take long to read.

And here endeth any interest in Bishop Hill. You're like children who will not concede and just repeat the same views endlessly.

Jun 4, 2018 at 7:43 PM | It doesn't add up...

It is refreshing to read that a Tommy Robinson supporter is not quibbling about the Law, Facts, Evidence, prior warnings, imprisonment etc or that he has no one else to blame apart from himself.

With those easily verifiable issues not being disputed .........

Esther Rantzen and That's Life featured child sex abuse by teachers in schools in 1986, and provided a phone number for children to ring. They did. That led to Childline. Esther Rantzens repeated message was that you must listen to the children.

The accounts were not just about seedy looking dirty old men in failing state schools. They included respected gentlemen in posh private boarding schools, that have now closed as a result.

It was not until about 10(?) years ago that children/adults with a background in Care Homes, Prisons, drugs, prostitution etc were finally listened to, by Social Workers, Lawyers, Police and Courts as they gave evidence. About 5(?) years ago, "they" finally listened to victims accusing predominently Asian men. (I have no idea whether any of the witnesses/victims in these cases fall into any of these descriptions.)

My concern about Delingpole's article is his omission to mention the rights of the victims/witnesses to a fair trial, aswell as the Defendants. As UK Law is finally doing something, Robinson keeps trying to make it go backwards again.

So no significant issues with what Delingpole writes, only with what he hasn't mentioned about Robinson's actions and their consequences.

I had originally noted the inconsistency between Robinson being arrested for "Breach of the Peace" and charged with "Contempt of Court". When I came across the Secret Barrister article he had explained this inconsistency. I admitted it here and credited the Secret Barrister.

Jun 4, 2018 at 6:30 PM | Harry Passfield

I do not question any of your ideas! I last bought and used a Train Ticket to travel from Hampshire to Waterloo, and then on to London Excell for the 2017 Boat Show.

I have used trains occasionally to travel to one-off bits of work in London, but have never used a Season Ticket. The ridiculous industrial action on South East Trains concerning who can press a button to open a door, or something, has caused many to lose confidence in trains as a reliable and convenient means of transport.

The idea that Trades Unions would exploit any issue to wreak havoc remains perfectly plausible.

I have never understood how privatising Trains and Railway Tracks as separate companies, without any incentive to co-operate towards improved customer service was supposed to work.

Mussolini did at least get Italian trains to run on time, and when I was there 10 years ago, they still did. Whether the economics of Italian Railways are better or worse than the rest of Italy, I have no idea.

By 1945, there was not much left of French German and Italian Railways. They needed complete reconstruction. The UK patched repaired through the war, rest of the 1940s, 50s to the present day.

I am glad I do not rely on trains in the UK

Perhaps Delingpole has the balance about right:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/06/04/delingpole-martyrdom-tommy-robinson/

Talking of responsibilities (GC), I wonder who should carry the can for the cock-up over new train timetables? Grayling is being crucified in the HoC for not taking responsibility for it and the BBC, as ever, manage to find a cancer sufferer who has been severely inconvenienced by it all.

I have to believe that the rail companies game-played the new timetables and ran them through computer models (cough), but my conspiricist antennae quivers at the idea that the unions would find it to their (Labour) advantage to disrupt the timetables as a way of promoting Corbyn's claims that only a publicly-owned railway can deliver what the public (ie: Labour) wants.

I really think there is more to this than meets the eye.

stewgreen, do you understand Legal Liability, and do you have your own appropriate insurance, if no Employer does?

The experts that helped create the Grenfell Tower fire, are beginning to realise that they cannot absolve themselves by blaming and accusing others, through their own ignorance.

Justice has occurred today in the trial of a young female Moslem terrorist. Reporting Restrictions were (I believe) observed, until lifted today, so there can be no grounds for claims of interference.

You go figure it out for yourself.

SG. Oakland and San Francisco are as different as can be. Oakland is predominantly black (whereas San Francisco is white and asian (with both China and Japan Towns)). This makes a very different setting to any story involving race relations.