@Jun 3, 2018 at 8:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterMark Hodgson

I found it astonishing - the gall and arrogance of it! Where is the government in all this i wonder.
KFM

Kleinefeldmaus, I saw the piece with AC Grayling on TV, and was appalled. One of our supposedly greatest thinkers openly indulging in anti-UK behaviour to try to get what he wants because he disagreed with the outcome of a democratic process. He and his Liberal MEP pal of course obtained open access to the office of Guy Verhofstadt.

From AC Grayling's Wikipedia entry:

"His political affiliations lie on the centre-left, and he has defended human rights and politically liberal values in print and by activism."

And yet, here he is, behaving in a distinctly illiberal manner.

For those who question whether Germany is seeking to control Europe:

"Germany targets the atom
It’s part of a broader push to shut nuclear power in Europe."

https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-nuclear-energy-belgium-doel-tihange-targets-the-atom/

"Germany is coming after its neighbors’ nuclear reactors.

Berlin is getting rid of its own nuclear plants — the last is supposed to shut down by the end of 2022 — and is turning its attention to the danger posed by rickety reactors in Belgium and France

“Germany has made a decision in favor of a nuclear power exit. It would be desirable if our neighbors would take old plants offline, too,” Environment Minister Svenja Schulze said on May 22.

Berlin’s move is part of a broader push by the EU’s anti-nuclear countries, which include Austria and Luxembourg, to squeeze out nuclear power in favor of greener options such as renewables and increased energy efficiency."

Increased energy efficiency? What? But guess what:

"This article is part of Raw Power, a series on Europe’s clean energy revolution."

In other words, it's the sponsored section.

AC Grayling met Guy Verhofstadt and the Lib Dem MEP to discuss a co-ordinated approach to Brexit negotiations that intended to be so tough that UK voters would regret leaving and come 'knocking on the door.' Henry viii would have known what to do with them.....but then with the boot on the other foot ...so would Guy as you can see...
AC Grayling – classic traitor? –or just ijit - here

Again: Trial was over. Jury retired to deliberate evidence and reach verdict.

Jun 3, 2018 at 1:35 AM | Pcar

Again: just because you repeat yourself, does not make you a reliable source. Do you repeat your trust in stewgreen's legal expertise?

@GC,

I agree with stewgreen:

@Golf you look ridiculous saying Guido has NOT lost the plotCartoon?

See: May 28, 2018 at 7:04 PM Pcar

Contempt of Court: "when that covers disobeying/insulting/obstructing a judge - in his perception - any time, any place, any where...

Is GC on holiday and A Knitpicker hijacked?

May 29, 2018 at 12:57 AM | Pcar

I don't see why you guys are putting effort into trying to convert @GC; there is no point on dwelling 
Over time more facts will all come out.
I have no wish to see him get angrier and angrier

Jun 3, 2018 at 12:23 AM | stewgreen

Have any facts come out so far that prove you have got anything right?

Since you kicked off with this:

"Wow Guido has lost the plot 
He's sitting their throwing insults at Tommy Robinson
Guido always anti-Ukip ...but now he's behaving like Anti-fa"
May 28, 2018 at 2:22 PM | stewgreen

you keep compounding your own errors, because you can't or won't admit your mistakes, guesses and false assumptions. Just like Climate Science since Mann' Hockey Stick.

What is it that you are trying to "convert" me to? Your failed faith in Tommy Robinson? If you only post here as a professional propaganda artist, just like some Climate Science advocates, do you think you offer better value? I am not sure if they have endured funding cuts.

Are all your contributions here as badly sourced and unreliable as the stuff you have posted about UK Law and Tommy Robinson?

You also said you don't trade insults. You dish them out readily enough, even to Guido Fawkes, but squeal when it goes wrong, and people challenge you back.

What was the most viewed story at Guido Fawkes this week? This one:

https://order-order.com/2018/05/29/tommy-robinson-jailed-reporting-restrictions-lifted/

He still thinks Tommy Robinson is an idiot. There are copies of the warnings given to Tommy Robinson, so how can he claim to have been victimised?

Copenhagen was the turning point in the demise of the Climate Scam - mainly due to the so called 'Climategate' debacle - none the less it still has 'legs'. But the control over our lives that it once had is waning.
Prophets of gloom here..and then this..
Obama and the Chicago scam here Obama's role in this dubious affair is well enough documented - what credibillity does he really possess? And then look at this threadbare Paris 'Accord".

somebody relatively prominent turned up was unwelcome and viewed as a threat and a challenge to the authorities ongoing efforts to downplay the incidents and yes.... cover up.

Jun 2, 2018 at 11:10 PM | tomo
and Mike Fowle

You are forgetting the rights of the witnesses/victims AND defendants to a fair trial, fair verdict and fair outcome for all present. Taxpayers are footing the bill, which may include Defence costs, should the trial require a re-run. There is also the 3rd Trial. As with the 1st, and this, the 2nd, I have no background information.

Tommy Robinson deliberately decided to make this trial all about him. If he wants to appeal his sentence, should Taxpayers have to pay the costs?

Should any of the Defendants in this Trial be found Guilty, and then appeal the Verdict on grounds linked to interference by Tommy Robinson, should Tommy Robinson be held liable for the costs incurred by Taxpayers? It could be £millions.

Did Tommy Robinson consider any of the consequences to others, of his deliberate attempt to blow-up a trial? Apart from the fact that he is alive and will be enjoying Her Majesty's finest Christmas turkey, what makes Tommy Robinson believe he has better morals than a Moslem terrorist with a suicide bomb, that only maims but doesn't kill?

Should the victims/witnesses be able to sue Tommy Robinson for emotional stress? It could be £millions.

If Tommy Robinson fears for his own safety in prison, he can apply for Segregation under Rule 43, helpfully explained here:
http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no10/prison.htm
 'Nonces' or 'Bacons' (sex offenders) and other 'Protection-heads' (debtors, grasses, cell thieves etc.) are usually segregated for their own safety under Prison Rule 45 (formerly 43). They should not be confused with prisoners held in the block (the segregation unit) under Prison Rule 45 GOAD (Good Order and Discipline).