Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« The Empty Shibboleth | Main | Davey rants and raves »
Monday
Jun032013

Cheshire gas

Gas prospector IGas has announced that there could be huge quantities of shale gas in the area it has been licensed to explore (story here).

The company's licences cover an area of 300 sq miles across Cheshire.

It had previously said it had about nine trillion cubic feet of shale gas. It now estimates that the volume of "gas initially in place" could range from 15.1 trillion cubic feet to 172.3 trillion cubic feet - nearly 20 times more.

To put that in perspective, UK demand is currently about 3TCF per annum, so we are talking about a lot of gas. Of course, there's the question of how much is extractable, but this is still very good news.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    - Bishop Hill blog - Cheshire gas

Reader Comments (29)

Depressingly however, the BBC feels it necessary to add the "frighteners" about "causing earthquakes" and "poluting the water table". Still, all in all rather good news. Not that it will make gass prices cheaper though, the government's tax regime will see to that.

Jun 3, 2013 at 9:04 AM | Unregistered CommenterPogo

But it will not and can not be economic to extract.
Those with degrees in PPE will ensure that.

Jun 3, 2013 at 9:43 AM | Unregistered CommenterDon Keiller

This will not please Ed Davey who is intending to have a “near carbon-free power sector” by 2030:
www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/10095188/Ed-Davey-attacks-papers-who-report-destructive-climate-sceptics.html
He's an Oxford PPE.

Jun 3, 2013 at 10:01 AM | Unregistered CommenterQuercus

What is Black Shale? Looking at the map the BBC have produced it would seem that the onshore licences are not over the large swathes of Black Shale deposits (a massive area around Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire, etc) - does it not have shale gas in it? And if so, why publish the map showing Black Shale?

Why won't prices for the gas come down? Is it because it is expensive to extract, or because green taxes will be levied? If the latter, then surely FOE ought to be appeased as they will still be able to promote renewable energy (such as wood chip burning....../sarc).

On another side issue, although this may be a matter of law or Parliamentary rules, I am having a small problem understanding the difference between Mercer and Yeo. At least Mercer has fallen (almost) on his sword. Can't say I've noticed Yeo doing the same, but perhaps he might once he's emptied the trough.

Jun 3, 2013 at 10:48 AM | Unregistered CommenterGrumpy

Thought it was 115 to 170 trillion cubic feet. The company has already been doing drilling to estimate gas in place so it is unlikely that there would be so wide a range.

Jun 3, 2013 at 10:48 AM | Unregistered Commentersam

The BBC interview with the IGas man stated that earthquakes were definitely caused by fracking. This is a LIE since even the BGS stated after their investigations that fracking COULD cause minor tremors of up to R2.4. This is the same as a large truck passing you at 50MPH 100ft away. Hardly house shattering or even earth moving.
AS a note-- most minor earthquakes are caused by movement on unknown faults.

Jun 3, 2013 at 11:09 AM | Unregistered CommenterJohn Marshall

With all those salt mines that have been operating in Cheshire for hundreds of years, what's a few more minor earth tremors? And one thing is certain: being close to Manchester, the Cheshire Gap is not renowned for a shortage of available water supplies.

Jun 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM | Unregistered CommenterPhillip Bratby

@John Marshall - 'The BBC interview with the IGas man stated that earthquakes were definitely caused by fracking. This is a LIE since even the BGS stated after their investigations that fracking COULD cause minor tremors of up to R2.4.'

I was working in the gas industry when natural gas was discovered beneath the North Sea. The environmentalists of the time were apoplectic with their warnings of the dire consequences of drilling and extraction.

Some even went so far as to insist that extracting the gas from its pockets in the sea bed would actually cause the sea bed to collapse and drain the North Sea!

In those days the BBC was nowhere near as biased as today so the utterings of the Eco Warriors were, by and large, ignored.

Jun 3, 2013 at 12:04 PM | Unregistered CommenterYertizz

Once upon a time our government would have treated such news as good news.

Jun 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM | Unregistered CommenterJamesG

Need a better map. If it's in Cheshire, Greenpeace will say it's underneath Alderly Edge, even if it is under Runcorn.

Jun 3, 2013 at 1:32 PM | Unregistered Commentermichael hart

Yertizz,
You must be thinking of the famous Bob Roberts monologue, "the Oily Rig" - very funny:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Oily-Rig-Recitation/dp/B003PW4CY0

Jun 3, 2013 at 2:42 PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn in France

The US version of HIGNFY on fracking: http://youtu.be/BLvOHsQBcSg

Jun 3, 2013 at 2:44 PM | Unregistered CommenterZT

John in France - I have now, thanks

And ZT - Miles McInnes, the Archetypal American Fruitcake.

Jun 3, 2013 at 3:53 PM | Unregistered CommenterYertizz

Ed Davey just spoke in favour of shale gas - he mentioned it in his speech here:

we would be utterly foolish to reject the development and use of lower-carbon fossil fuels such as gas to replace dirtier ones such as coal as a staging post on the way – particularly if this drives down emissions while other technologies mature.

In the panel discussion afterwards, he said that if the UK didn't exploit shale gas then it would be importing gas from abroad instead.

Jun 3, 2013 at 4:15 PM | Registered CommenterRichard Betts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9CfUm0QeOk

Small question for the British Geological Survey Fracking is currently suspended in the UK How many Earthquakes were there in the UK last year and this year .

Jun 3, 2013 at 4:21 PM | Unregistered Commenterjamspid

@Richard Betts

Do you think the lights are at last coming on in Davey's head and how long will it take him to act before the lights (and everything else) start to go out for the rest of us?

Jun 3, 2013 at 4:42 PM | Unregistered CommenterYertizz

"Small question for the British Geological Survey ..."

http://www.earthquakes.bgs.ac.uk/earthquakes/recent_uk_events.html

The BGS report lots ...

Jun 3, 2013 at 5:05 PM | Unregistered Commentergraphicconception

Richard Betts,

It's at last getting through to the fruitcakes (maybe), that the insane policy of building useless wind turbines to combat the mythical global warming, will need 100% backup from despatchable gas-fired power stations. But as anyone with any sense can deduce, you're far better off just building the gas-fired power stations.

Jun 3, 2013 at 5:16 PM | Unregistered CommenterPhillip Bratby

Anyone else get upset about framing such as Davey's

the development and use of lower-carbon fossil fuels such as gas to replace dirtier ones such as coal
Back when coal did produce lots of real air pollution, "dirty" was apt. But now the term is being trundled out to mean "higher CO2 intensity" and used deliberately to evoke the negative connotations of its former usage.
Lies, damn lies, statistics, PR and politics. In that order.

Jun 3, 2013 at 5:26 PM | Registered CommenterHaroldW

Philip

But as anyone with any sense can deduce, you're far better off just building the gas-fired power stations.

Unfortunately that rules out Mr PotatoEd, the whole of the LibDem party, David Cameron and most of the other numpties who currently hold power (pun intended) in the UK. Wont last. Stupidity has a shelf life and this particular stupidity is coming to the end of its! Make sure your UKIP man knows the political importance of linking economic performance with the cost of energy!!!!

Jun 3, 2013 at 5:26 PM | Unregistered CommenternTropywins

nTropywins:

My UKIP man knows all right! He's not a numpty.

Jun 3, 2013 at 5:46 PM | Registered CommenterPhillip Bratby

The sooner they get this stuff flowing the better. I've just paid a hefty gas bill for the last quarter. After having a quick sift through my old bills I realised the latest bill was over three times more expensive than the equivalent 2010 bill. Phew, global warming my sit upon.

Jun 3, 2013 at 6:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterMartyn

Martyn.

We're told that fish are moving north because the oceans are getting warmer. However, despite the sunshine of the last few days the air is still cold and that's because the seas are much colder than normal. Yet another consequence of global warming: global warming is causing the oceans to heat up, which is causing the seas around the UK to get colder - you couldn't make it up (unless you're a warmist).

Jun 3, 2013 at 7:14 PM | Registered CommenterPhillip Bratby

In reality, as long as the permissible earthquake limits are set so amazingly low, no one will ever drill for, let alone extract, shale gas....

The bureaucrats have all the cards and will play them as slowly as they possibly can until their political overlords tell them to grow up.

Jun 3, 2013 at 7:23 PM | Registered Commenterdiogenes

I used to be an Oxford PPE. But then I got saved.

Jun 3, 2013 at 7:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterArthur Peacock

Thanks for that synopsis Philip I'll sleep easy tonight knowing my future gas bills are set to continue going through the roof. Perhaps I should forward your synopsis on to Ed Davey he could include it in one of his speechlesses.

Jun 3, 2013 at 7:43 PM | Unregistered CommenterMartyn

Martyn:

You need a "sustainable" form of energy. Ever thought of going out at night and harvesting local trees (sorry, I mean biomass)? It's the new source of renewable energy all over Europe. If you're very clever, you might even get a big Government (sorry, I mean taxpayer) subsidy for doing it because you will be helping to save the planet.

Jun 3, 2013 at 9:01 PM | Unregistered CommenterPhillip Bratby

The "earthquake" meme gets trotted round the ring every time.
T'other day the Beeb reported an "earth tremor" of 3.4 on the Richter scale (I think it was in N. Wales) yet the far smaller disturbances of around 1 - 2 R (on a logarithmic scale) attributed to fracking in Cumbria are always reported as "earthquakes".

Diogenes: I fear you are right. The first mole fart will allow them to pull the plug.

Jun 3, 2013 at 10:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterMikeH

mmm..how about badger furnaces...are they green enough?

Jun 3, 2013 at 11:57 PM | Unregistered Commenterdiogenes

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>