Whoops

Some of you may have seen a story here about my forthcoming GWPF report. I'd missed the embargo date, so I've taken the story down. Ill repost on Thursday.

Apologies for the confusion.

Comments

[Jiminy Cricket]

:) Bob will have to wait for his name in up lights just a little longer...

[Richard Drake]

I'm enjoying it all the same!

[Jiminy Cricket]

Shhh.....

[stephen richards]

What GWPF blog. I didn't see it honest, it wasn't me. :))

[Arthur Dent]

I suppose I will have to mark my copy "Don't quote, cite or circulate" then

[SayNoToFearmongers]

The link you posted still works ;-)

[Ken]

I see. So the only way to get the information taken down is by a FOI request ....

[Mailman]

What did the report say?

If you tell me I'll tell you if you are right! :)

Regards

Mailman

[Sparks]

D'oh! :)

[Maurizio Morabito]

A properly evil denier is so evil he is evil against himself too.

[diogenes]

you should set up a sweepstake to predict the inevitable Bob Ward take-down, 10 seconds after the press-release.

My starter is:

"this study does nothing to destroy the firnly-held scientific concensus that CO2 emissions are likely to have catastrphic effects on global climate and envirnonments."

[Jiminy Cricket]

@diogenes

Not sure...more like "Who are the funders of the GWPF? This is clearly a political attack by persons in the dark shadows of right-wing interests etc... blah blah blah..."

GWPF clearly has them worried. First time Bob Ward is being beaten at his own game

He recognises the rules.

[Nicholas Hallam]

"Nullius in verba"

Very neat to turn the Royal Society's old motto on themselves. I'm looking forward to the full discussion tomorrow.

[Maurizio Morabito]

I would have called it "De nullis verba", since the RS is slowly disappearing in a fog of irrelevance.