Monday
May092011
by Bishop Hill
Please tell me this isn't true
May 9, 2011
From here:
Students in a Society and History (SAH) class on “the Impact of Climate Change” at a Tasmanian high school, must donate to a Canadian environmental organisation in order to be awarded points in a “scavenger hunt” and to gain marks.
Reader Comments (13)
And me too.
All my education was in Tasmania. That ended in 1990 but I do think it was a pretty good one. I don't live there now but I do tell people with (maybe misplaced?) pride that it is a pretty good place to bring up children. It's reasonably impossible not to live close to the bush or farming and I have always thought that a good way to experience some reality about "The Environment"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjsuAc-n8-E. From 03:38, “And what are these students doing? They are running a school fair where all the proceeds go towards deforestACTION!”
Report from last year’s Grade 7 class:
Comment by a student from the nearby primay school on the deforestACTION site:
http://collaborateforchange.com/2011/04/20/21st-century-skills-10-simple-examples-of-entrepreneurship-and-innovation/.
http://collaborateforchange.com/deforestaction/
Selling worthless bits of paper to children is a pretty low form of fraud, in my view. But then as the team has shown on numerous occasions, fraud is fine as long as it is in a Good Cause.
On the one hand, my son’s high school promotes Wellness:
On the other hand, the teachers do nothing about the students’s smoking area:
I have some worries about this. I've never seen anything about it on Oz sceptic blogs. I imagine Andrew Bolt in particular would have been all over it. The school is not named. Anyway FWIW, here's an updated link listing some of the questions -
There are more.
A whole generation has been artificially dyed green, and will spend the rest of their lives trying to rid themselves of the stain.
=============
Deadman
On the other hand, the teachers do nothing about the students’s smoking area
But tobacco -- or whatever they are smoking -- is a "renewable" fuel source. It's green -- just like their lungs will be.
Reminds me of the WWF commercial about 'saving' the polar bears (from what..?) - 'send three pounds...'
What happens..? Does a WWF operative sidle up to a polar bear sitting on an ice floe, and say: 'Here y'are, mate - here's three quid - go and get yerself a nice fish supper...'...?
It isn't true.
One of the projects on the list is to sell the vouchers, which seems a bit out of order for part of an academic course, but it's optional . There are other projects instead. It's not an enforced donation by the students. The headline on IOCC is a gross exagerration . Quelle surprise.
I stand by the use of the word, “enforced”. The teacher, in position of authority over adolescent students instructs them (and manipulats them with a bribe):
Of course the children feel compelled to comply with the terms of the project. It is worth noting that, for lazier but wealthier students, the easiest way to gain points, and to outscore other, poorer but more industrious students, is to sell vouchers, and promote the environmentalist organisation.Furthermore, the teacher propagandises for the Canadian organisation using peer-group pressure; for example: The children are instructed to donate their own money, and encouraged to persuade others to register with the collective. My son feels pressured, hates the class, and (as he wrote in his review of the class) has been mocked by the teacher for not mindlessly agreeing with her uncritical acceptance of claims which even the IPCC won’t accept. (See here.)
It’s a nice racket, to exploit the uninformed sympathies and free labour of school-children.