Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent posts
Recent comments
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« Josh 20 | Main | BBC science coverage »
Saturday
Apr242010

A nice review

Bret Swanson, who is the head of a company called Entropy Economics, has written a very nice review of the Hockey Stick Illusion.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (19)

I posted a comment at Bret Swanson's site. Hopefully, every little helps with sales.

Apr 24, 2010 at 1:09 PM | Unregistered CommenterPhillip Bratby

Ha ha “Potemkin” charts haven’t seen that one used in years. Nice review.

Apr 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM | Unregistered Commentermartyn

A most excellent review. Sounds like The Da Vinci Code.

Apr 24, 2010 at 2:56 PM | Unregistered CommenterDon Pablo de la Sierra

I read the reviews on Amazon (US). There were 14 five stars and 3 one stars. Pretty polarized. If I wanted to read one "AGW is real" book and one "AGW is a scam or at least unsubstantiated" book, what would people recommend? Do any middle ground books exist?

Apr 24, 2010 at 3:30 PM | Unregistered CommenterMike

Mike,

I don't think you will find any in-between opinions on catastrophic global warming. This is one of those things for which you have to analyze the information and make up you own mind. That process should entail research into the scientific method and information surrounding the issue. Sadly, your decision may also depend on you political affiliation.

CAGW advocates are many times extreme envrionmentalists who are on the same political path with socialists, communists, and others who want to cripple capitalism. This is because eliminating the dominant cause of human caused carbon emissions will decimate the economies of the civilized world, and that seems to be their primary goal.

Apr 24, 2010 at 4:37 PM | Unregistered Commenterbob

Slightly OT Andrew. Very pleased to see at CA that Judith Curry is going to review your book here and list questions that RC should answer. High expectations of the former but not much of the latter!

Apr 24, 2010 at 5:35 PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn Hewitt

Mike - I asked Lord Monckton for his recommended books for the layman (before Hockey Stick Illusion was released) and this is what he replied:

Heaven and Earth, by Ian Plimer;
The Climate Caper, by Garth Paltridge;
Chill, by Peter Taylor;
The Real Global Warming Disaster, by Christopher Booker

Not a "middle ground" list, but one you might consider.

Apr 24, 2010 at 6:20 PM | Unregistered CommenterGarry

It is interesting that the three negative "reviews" on Amazon US were not reviews of the book. The first, by Judy Earl didn't even go into the book -- she attacked the Publisher

If you might have any doubts about this collection of, uh, science, you might do well to check out the publisher. A (renowned) science publisher? Any chance this work was peer reviewed by experts in the field? You be the judge:

"Stacey International welcomes unsolicited proposals, particularly those which may build on certain core areas of our list.

The second by Max Rockbin (amusing name) claimed that:

By the time you read this, the premise of this book will have been debunked by all credible sources.
Newer data has only reinforced the premise of "the hockey stick" graph.

And the third, David Lewis, said: I wonder how "they" got the leaders of every national science academy in the world to buy into the big hoax? How was it that the President of the National Academy of Sciences in the US, and the leaders of the similarly prestigious organizations in every developed country in the world all signed the Joint Academies Statement warning civilization that it must move to a low carbon society as quickly as possible?

I wonder if any of them read the book, or even actually saw a copy?

Trolls.


Bob had it nailed in his comments above.


Garry -- Perhaps Judith Curry could try to write a "middle ground" book.

Apr 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM | Unregistered CommenterDon Pablo de la Sierra

A well deserved review. I trust that you are now accumulating evidence for your sequel Hockey Stick Illusion 2. I suspect that the land based temperature records are as dubious as the tree ring data.

Apr 24, 2010 at 7:58 PM | Unregistered Commenteroldtimer

Mike, middle ground books are pretty rare. You might try "Climate Confusion" by Roy Spencer, who (broadly speaking) accepts AGW but not catastrophic AGW. It's pretty basic, but that can be a good thing.

Apr 24, 2010 at 8:24 PM | Unregistered CommenterJonathan

It does deserve, and will, win prizes.

Apr 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM | Unregistered CommenterPharos

I have just finished your book sir, a truly wonderful insight, for which I thank you. I have emailed all the prospective parliamentary candidates in my constituency to ask if they have read the book. The pretext being that any potential legislator's due diligence on AGW would benefit from your insight. I have not received any replies.

On an OT subject, if allowed, would you like to exert your wonderful analytical skills on the following, it has my feeble mind in a spin: -

“Dinosaurs died from sudden temperature drop 'not comet strike', scientists claim”

“The drop in temperature is thought to have occurred because high levels of CO2 were in the atmosphere which caused global temperatures to rise and polar ice to melt – a phenomenon currently predicted for Earth.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/dinosaurs/7624014/Dinosaurs-died-from-sudden-temperature-drop-not-comet-strike-scientists-claim.html

Apr 24, 2010 at 10:40 PM | Unregistered Commentergreensand

greensand,

Might I suggest you go one step further. Ask if they will accept a copy and if so, send one. Then, a generous period of time later, contact them and see what they think about it - or encourage them to get round to reading it.

Apr 24, 2010 at 11:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterCameron Rose

greensand,

Thank you for your OT comment. May I add, that by 65 million years ago, the end of Cretaceous period and the beginning of the Cenozoic, no ice caps existed, north or south. The 'present' ice caps started 40 million years ago with the growth of an ice sheet in Antarctica - 30 million years ago in Arctic.

April 24, 2010 Taras

Apr 25, 2010 at 12:03 AM | Unregistered CommenterTaras

greensand,

Thank you for your OT comment. May I add, that by 65 million years ago, the end of Cretaceous period and the beginning of the Cenozoic, no ice caps existed, north or south. The 'present' ice caps started 40 million years ago with the growth of an an ice sheet in Antarctica - 30 million years ago in Arctic.

April 24, 2010 Taras

Apr 25, 2010 at 12:05 AM | Unregistered CommenterTaras

24 April: Daily Mail: BBC lectures us incessantly on climate change. So why did their bosses make 68,000 domestic flights in two years?
Deputy Director General Mark Byford took plane to Manchester for the Open golf... three hours by train
Director General Mark Thompson flew to Newcastle for Tory drinks party... and Glasgow for concert
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1268613/Every-night-BBC-lectures-climate-change-So-did-bosses-make-68-000-domestic-flights-years.html

Apr 25, 2010 at 12:52 AM | Unregistered Commenterpat

I just checked and the book is presently out-of-stock on Amazon, USA....hope that's GOOD news! [but not for me]

[BH adds: try the Book Depository - free shipping to the US]

Apr 25, 2010 at 4:14 AM | Unregistered Commentersdcougar

There are ten copies of the book available for AUD$22.80 each on ebay Australia from Aphrohead Bookstore which posts worldwide from the UK.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Hockey-Stick-Illusion-Climategate-and-Corrupti-/250607985302

Apr 25, 2010 at 1:40 PM | Unregistered CommenterE O'Connor

I enjoyed George Gilder's phrase "factitious data", even if it was a typo!

Apr 26, 2010 at 1:17 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames P

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>