Click images for more details



Recent posts
Recent comments

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« BBC will stop being biased | Main | Cowrin', timorous beasties »

Josh 48

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (19)


Josh strikes again! Brilliant! Captures Bob Ward (FGS) (FFS) :-D

Oct 12, 2010 at 9:12 PM | Unregistered CommenterSimon Hopkinson

"Gosh that was a quick transformation". From man to mouse in one move would do.

Oct 12, 2010 at 9:39 PM | Unregistered CommenterPhillip Bratby

But Bob's got 'robust and compelling evidence'. Somewhere. He even told the Science Museum so.

Oct 12, 2010 at 9:44 PM | Unregistered CommenterPharos

For those that haven't seen it, here is why Bob is not able to "debate" he can't even have a discussion with an AGW believer.

Oct 12, 2010 at 9:56 PM | Unregistered CommenterZT

This should improve his ability to communicate with his friend Micky. Oh Mannn

Oct 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM | Unregistered Commenterpesadia

Thanks for the link ZT.

Is Ward's strange voice a failure in his electronics or an attempt to synthesise what a mouse might sound like? It's certainly non-human.

Oct 12, 2010 at 10:31 PM | Unregistered CommenterLatimer Alder


Oct 12, 2010 at 10:41 PM | Unregistered CommenterJimmy Haigh

May be Bob is on an expenses paid, world wide tour, jetting here, there, and everywhere, telling people to cut fown their carbon footprint.

The rest of the Grantham Institute may be concerned about possible dangerously high levels of CO2 in a public debating arena. They have certainly scared enough people about the dire consequences, and sheer difficulties of existing in such a hostile environment.

Oct 12, 2010 at 10:43 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charley

Beautiful Josh!

Oct 12, 2010 at 10:50 PM | Unregistered CommenterDung

Thanks Josh, really funny. Thanks ZT for that reminder. Here's mine.

Oct 13, 2010 at 12:24 AM | Unregistered CommenterLucy Skywalker

Is it a mouse or a rat?

Oct 13, 2010 at 4:10 AM | Unregistered Commenterhunter

Thanks for the link ZT. I couldn't stomach watching it all. All I can add is that Josh's cartoons convey a remarkable likeness.

Oct 13, 2010 at 8:21 AM | Unregistered CommenterPhillip Bratby

I read an interesting article recently on how cartoonists develop their caricatures. The Blair one was so well developed that all was needed was that mad staring eye to associate with the former PM.

FGS Bob Ward's is developing nicely.

Oct 13, 2010 at 8:31 AM | Unregistered CommenterJiminy Cricket

Great stuff Josh :)

Tks for that link Lucy, if only Ch4 would do another, updated, version of "swindle", I know many people for whom it was their original seed of doubt.

Oct 13, 2010 at 9:47 AM | Unregistered Commenterpete

The problem is not the Grantham Institute, nor may I say Bob Ward, but with Pielke Jnr and the notion of academic respect.

We know GI is an alarmist organisation, we know full well too that Ward is just a GI paid knuckle-dragger (not a mouse). Pielke Jnr is upset because feels GI are being disrepectful. That can only be if Pielke Jnr holds a high opinion of GI and requires himself some acknowledgement from this organisation that he exists academically. I have no sympathy for Pielke Jnr - more fool him.

Oct 13, 2010 at 10:53 AM | Unregistered CommenterMac

I never realised before. Bob Ward is a Vulcan!

Well, whatever, the descent to Mus seems reasonable.

Oct 13, 2010 at 11:52 AM | Unregistered CommenterJerry

Pete, I remember Swindle, and it was very good, even if a graph was wrongly used in the first edition.

I don't have time to search it out, but I recall that YouTube remembers the programme too: The Great Global Warming Swindle was the full title if memory serves, and I should expect it is still relevant: it is not as if the CAGW hypothesis has moved on much, bar a change or two of name.

Oct 13, 2010 at 2:48 PM | Unregistered CommenterJeff Wood

If you're old enough to remember the "Eagle" comic, BW is a Mekon.

Oct 13, 2010 at 4:32 PM | Unregistered CommenterMessenger

I can not remember what made me sceptical to start with (probably just bloody minded hehe) but I know what reinforced that scepticism and it was a two page article in the Telegraph by Monkton, full of facts theories and graphs. A week later there was a two page reply by Al Gore, full of disaster photos with only two supposed facts, both of which were false ^.^

Oct 13, 2010 at 5:55 PM | Unregistered CommenterDung

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>