Monday
Mar022009
by
Bishop Hill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388d5/388d59e3215f893a54248da4208624a92cb82a4c" alt="Author Author"
Banning the Dutch prime minister
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388d5/388d59e3215f893a54248da4208624a92cb82a4c" alt="Date Date"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388d5/388d59e3215f893a54248da4208624a92cb82a4c" alt="Category Category"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388d5/388d59e3215f893a54248da4208624a92cb82a4c" alt="Category Category"
LabourHome is reporting that if an election were to be held in the Netherlands today, Geert Wilders' Freedom Party would probably emerge as the largest in the Dutch parliament.
Which would give Jacqui Smith the amusing problem of having to ban the Dutch prime minister from these shores.
Reader Comments (4)
This disgraceful decision is still in force.
It is in the interests of many of those I loathe that this state of affairs is quietly forgotten but persists.
I do not intend to remind people of this every day, but certainly every couple of weeks, or more frequently, I will bring it up in conversation so that those who might otherwise forget are reminded of it.
The ban would remain in force if Geert Wilders got a new job, hopefully PM, wouldn't it?
He would have to be un-banned?
Wilders was allowed into the USA, where he made a great speech.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/625728.stm