Wednesday
Dec232009
by
Bishop Hill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388d5/388d59e3215f893a54248da4208624a92cb82a4c" alt="Author Author"
CRU website live again
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388d5/388d59e3215f893a54248da4208624a92cb82a4c" alt="Date Date"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388d5/388d59e3215f893a54248da4208624a92cb82a4c" alt="Category Category"
Hat-tip to a reader for pointing out that the CRU website is now live again, although the data pages do not as yet seem to be complete.
Books
Click images for more details
A few sites I've stumbled across recently....
Hat-tip to a reader for pointing out that the CRU website is now live again, although the data pages do not as yet seem to be complete.
Reader Comments (5)
Still got their hokey, lying graph on the front page. 2008 anomaly "+0.33C"
'It's life Jim, but not as we know it'
"If there is anything specific you would like to see restored soon...": the reputation of the University of East Anglia?
Mojo: Until June, HADCRUT3v showed 2008 as 0.326. Now it is 0.330. Has this been discussed before? Also noticed that when the datasets were wiped back to february, they have reappeared with extra hundredths added. Seems like the year wasn't going as demanded, so history has been corrected.
Retrospective corrections to temperature sets have been noted before. It's a remarkable phenomenon which deserves further analysis, but is made impossible by the secrecy surrounding climate science.