Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Unthreaded

Stewgreen, yes there is a wall. Which is why the public keep surprising them.

Oct 30, 2016 at 6:49 PM | Unregistered CommenterTinyCO2

BBC issues staff with new official badge

Oct 30, 2016 at 4:15 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

I've just realised something
** They've gone and built a wall
and we've all paid for it ! **

Who ? BBC/ MSM and the liberal establishment built a Thought Wall

Do you think LeftMob believe in Diversity ?
That’s what they claim, but when you engage with them
You find they are interested in CONFORMITY of THOUGHT not diversity of thought.
Go out to a LeftMob forum or independent Forum which they have territorialised and dare to give an opinion different to LeftMob and see what happens.

They immediately see you as a criminal cos you have a different opinion from them “You are not one of us”
They march along their forum shouting
“LeftMob, LeftMob, We are LeftMob ! And we are right ! right ! right ! All off the time. Suck it up !”

Likewise the BBC for all it’s criticism of Trump has already built a VIRTUAL WALL which keeps OUT non-Left voices ..and keeps them off air.
...We've known about this will climate stuff for years; the BBC will not air non-left views, and in establishment places people are intimidated into not expressing none-leftmob views.
There's a wall that runs around BBC Radio 4 Comedy, All BBC News progs, BBC ClimateReligion keeping out all those voices that might challenge their dogma.
The same applies for most MSM except Fox and Breibart.

On forums Leftmob quickly gives up on logic and reverts to the fallacious arguments of : Misrepresentation, attacking the man and not the argument, cherry picking etc. And shout “Troll !” or shout “Racist !”, to close down the debate.

Oct 30, 2016 at 4:12 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

golfCharlie. Take more care if you do that tomorrow!

Oct 30, 2016 at 3:36 PM | Unregistered CommenterACK

ACK, I looked in a mirror this morning, and there I was!

Scary.

Oct 30, 2016 at 12:49 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

Where have the ghostly visages of the missing posts of John Silver, golfCharlie and Phil Clarke, pinned seemingly forever on the Recent Comments sidebar, gone? Do they still exist in some electronic Purgatory? What great insights did they contain, lost to us forever?

Oct 30, 2016 at 11:42 AM | Unregistered CommenterACK

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/10/29/scientists-plead-with-greenpeace-for-blind-dying-children/

Greenpeace would rather people died of starvation, than allow Golden Rice to be grown to feed them. It upsets Greenpeace's vision for the future.

To save human lives, Greenpeace must perish, starved of money.

Oct 30, 2016 at 1:41 AM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

Pcar

Jordan is to Syria to a certain extent what Pakistan was to Afghanistan. It's the primary base aiui for 'Merkan spooks in the area - it's pretty tangled but the Sunnis are determined to counter Shia activity (OK ... Iranian antics) and the Saudis and Gulf states have a history of using proxy combatants - Saddam Hussein was largely funded by KSA + Gulf money against the Iranians.

In all it's quite a mess and I think ... I'm with Richard Jones


We support the Iraqi government in the fight against the Islamic State. We don’t like IS but IS is supported by Saudi Arabia, whom we do like. We don’t like President Assad. We support the fight against him but not IS which is also fighting against him. We don’t like Iran but Iran supports the Iraqi government against IS. So, some of our friends support our enemies and some of our enemies are our friends and some of our enemies are fighting against our other enemies whom we want to lose but we don’t want our enemies who are fighting our enemies to win. If the people we want to defeat are defeated, they might be replaced by people we like even less. And all this was started by us invading a country to drive out terrorists who weren’t actually there until we went in to drive them out.

Do you understand now?

Oct 30, 2016 at 12:59 AM | Registered Commentertomo

The BBC emails article was economical with the New York Post's Page Six layout.

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/10/nypost-anthony-weiner-fbi-640x480.jpg

Oct 30, 2016 at 12:21 AM | Unregistered Commenterclipe

Pcar, all four of them have acquired legal knowledge, and may yet set Legal Precedents.

Whatever the US Presidential result, there are going to be legal actions and wrangles extending beyond the new President's term of office.

The credibility of the US in International Politics is going to be reduced, as Domestic Political retaliation and retribution becomes the driving force in Washington.

Oct 29, 2016 at 11:56 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

PostCreate a New Post

Enter your information below to create a new post.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>