Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Recent posts
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Discussion > Black Death CO2 and ideas about Climate Change

Harry made reference to this text
I paste it all here so you can pick out the parts you are interested in
Timeline Middle Ages and Early Modern Period
1300

Environmental upheavals linked to sever climate variability characterised the period from 1300 to 1400.

All tree ring series in northern Europe show a decline in growth rates, indicating an adverse climatic change. This marked the transition from a “Medieval Warm Period” to the “Little Ice Age” when temperatures were on average 1.5 degrees Celsius lower than before and with greater seasonal variation. The cooling trend associated with the Little Ice Age progressively moved from north-west to south-east across Europe, with the Vikings in the far North experiencing the clooing first, British Isles experiencing the effects from the 1290s and the Mediterranean after 1320

Written records from the 14th century provide accounts of severe weather in the period from 1314 to 1317, which led in turn to crop failure and famine. This episode of failed harvests and its consequences is known as “The Great Famine”. Notwithstanding these ecological calamities, the population of northern Europe was at an all time high by the second quarter of the 14th century. However, the arrival of the Black Death, in Europe in 1347 pushed the European population into a century-long demographic decline and caused long-term changes in economy and society.

1347
Germs and microbes are part of our environment. In fact, these creatures can be regarded as the most successful living things on the planet. Our invisible environment of microbes has also shaped events in world history in many ways. Nowhere was this more evident and visible ultimately, in the Black Death that affected, and infected, Eurasia during the 14th century. The Black Death spread from central Asia along trade routes and reached southern Europe in 1347. It swept quickly through the continent and reached northern Scandinavia and Iceland in 1350. Few areas escaped and by late 1350 between 30 and 40% of the European population had perished.

But what catapulted the Black Death on the world stage? Recently it has been suggested that a climatic event similar to the 536 dust veil event is responsible. Based on comparing the chronologies of prices, wages, grain harvests and the corresponding chronologies of growing conditions and climactic variations, taking into consideration dendrochronology, the Greenland ice cores it has emerged that the episodes of the Black Death coincide with depressed temperatures. Find out more in this video lecture by Professor Bruce Campbell of Queens University Belfast.
ruddiman CO2 graph

The dramatic decline of the European population caused by the Black Death coincided with a decline in global temperature. Coincidence? The climate was already getting colder because the northern hemisphere was heading for the Little Ice Age. At the same time agricultural land was taken out of production in Europe because of the 25-40% decline of the European population (depending on region). This means ploughing of less ground, which releases greenhouse gasses (Methane and carbonates) and forest clearance was reversed. More trees and scrubs mean that more carbon (CO2) was taken out of the atmosphere and stored in biomass. The abandoned farmland acted as a significant carbon sink because trees store carbon taken from the CO2 in the air.

From about 1350 CO2 levels in the atmosphere appear to fall following the Black Death. However, a long term declining trend may have already started before the Black Death. We know that the first two decades of the 14th century were wetter, windier and climatically more unstable than before. The declining trend also continued after the recovery of agriculture after 1440. The reforestation that followed the Black Death and the resulting decrease of CO2 in the atmosphere pronounced a natural cooling trend that was already underway: the beginning of the Little Ice Age (LIA). This does not mean the LIA was triggered by the Black Death but the latter possibly contributed to it, although temporarily.

Further reading
Gottfried, Robert S., The Black Death: natural and human disaster in medieval Europe (New York and London: Macmillan, 1983).

Yeloff, Dan and Bas van Geel, ‘Abandonment of farmland and vegetation succession following the Eurasian plague pandemic of ad 1347-52’, Journal of Biogeography, Vol. 34, No. 4 (2007), 575-582

1492
Biological exchanges and invasions are important drivers in history. Over the course of the Earth’s history there have been many biological invasions. Think for example of the species that took advantage of land bridges during ice ages, when sea levels were lower, to expand into new areas where they did not live before. These processes were relatively slow and only the most mobile species were able to migrate over long distances. Geographic barriers, such as oceans and mountain chains, inhibited migrations of most species and divided the earth into distinct biogeographical provinces. But with the development of long distance navigation in the 15th century people started to transport species from one continent to another on a scale and with a speed that the world had never experienced before.

This process of the exchange of biota is now familiar to many historians, as the Columbian Exchange, thanks to the work of Alfred Crosby. Crosby used the term to describe the exchange of agricultural goods and disease between the Eastern and Western Hemispheres that has occurred since 1492. To America, Europeans introduced crops like wheat, rice, bananas, sugar, and grapes. Europeans also brought a number of domesticated animals to the New World, including horses, cattle, pigs and sheep. The Eurasian species thrived in the America’s because their animals and plans encountered less competitions or it was even absent, altering eco-systems forever but also aiding the success of Europeans in the New World, a phenomenon dubbed “ecological imperialism” by Crosby.

However, the exchange process was not a one-way street. Africa and Eurasia acquired some very useful crops from the Americas, most notably potatoes and maize. The new food crops fuelled population growth in Europe, Africa and China.

One of the most dramatic consequences of the Columbian Exchange was the transportation of microbes to the America's that caused pandemics among the local populations. These populations had never been exposed to diseases such as small pox or measles. As a result is has been estimated that between 75 to 90 per cent of the indigenous populations of the America's perished.


Further reading
Crosby, Alfred W., Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900-1900 (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986)
Crosby, Alfred W., “Columbian exchange: plants, animals, and disease between the Old and New World”,National Humanities Center, nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/nattrans/ntecoindian/essays/columbian.htm
Crosby, Alfred W., The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492 (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Co., 1972)

1600

Winter severity graph
The Little Ice Age is a period between about 1300 and 1870 during which Europe and North America were subjected to much colder winters than during the 20th century. The period can be divided in two phases, the first beginning around 1300 and continuing until the late 1400s. There was a slightly warmer period in the 1500s, after which the climate deteriorated substantially. The period between 1600 and 1800 marks the height of the Little Ice Age.

During the height of the Little Ice Age, there are indications that average winter temperatures in Europe and North America were as much as 2°C lower than at present. The Baltic Sea froze over, as did most of the rivers in Europe. Winters were bitterly cold and prolonged, reducing the growing season by several weeks. These conditions led to widespread crop failure, famine, and in some regions population decline.

At the same time the 17th and 18th centuries were characterised by the expansion of European trade and the formation of European sea born Empires. This was directly linked to advances in technology harnessing more of nature's power and towards the end of the period fossil-fuelled power. These two hundred years also saw the specialisation of agricultural regions, which produced specific products for local and international markets.

For more details read the article The Little Ice Age

1645
Sunspot
The exact cause of the Little Ice Age is unknown, but many people have pointed at the coincidence in low sunspot activity and the timing of the Little Ice. This so called Maunder Minimum coincided with the coldest part of the Little Ice Age, in particular during the period roughly from 1645 to 1715, when sunspots were a rare occurrence, as noted by solar observers such as Cassini and Flamsteed. A minimum in sunspots, indicates an much less active and possibly colder sun and consequently less energy output to warm the earth.

The Maunder Minimum is named after astronomer E.W. Maunder who discovered the absence of sunspots during that period. Recently published data suggests that the Sun expanded during the Maunder Minimum and its rotation slowed. A larger and slower Sun, it is speculated, might also mean a cooler Sun that provides less heat to Earth. (Just why the Sun expands and contracts is not entirely understood).

Sunspot numbers

Further readingH.H. Lamb, "Climatic Fluctuations", in H. Flohn (ed), World Survey of Climatology. Vol.2. General Climatology (New York: Elsevier, 1969), p. 236; Schneider, S. H., and C. Mass, "Volcanic dust, sunspots, and temperature trends", Science, 190 (1975) 741-746.

John A. Eddy, "The Maunder Minimum", Science, 18 June 1976, Vol. 192, No. 4254, 1198-1202.

1661

Air pollution is not a new phenomenon. By the mid-1600s, London’s air had attracted the attention of one of the greatest minds of the time, John Evelyn, and advocate for forest regeneration. He published a book in 1661 entitled Fumifugium or the Inconvenience of the Aer, and Smoake of London Dissipated. The pamphlet is a call to clean up the air of the city of London. It described the effects of air pollution caused by coal burning on the on the population of London:

[In London] her Inhabitants breathe nothing but an impure and thick Mist, accompanied by a fuliginous and filthy vapour, which renders them obnoxious to a thousand inconveniences, corrupting the Lungs, and disordering the entire habit of their Bodies; so that Catharrs, Phthisicks, Coughs and Consumptions, rage more in this one City, than the whole Earth besides.
Evelyn suggested that burning wood instead of coal would be less harmful to the lungs and recommends relocating some of London’s more polluting industries outside the city, in particular lime-burning and brewing.

Timeline Prehistory & Antiquity | Timeline Industrial Revolution & 20th century

Feb 1, 2019 at 11:51 AM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

OK we probably only need the first 2 pragraphs
not the one beginning 1492 and after

The key part is
\\ The dramatic decline of the European population caused by the Black Death coincided with a decline in global temperature. Coincidence? ... (yep probbly coincidence, human brains are over programmed to seek cause and effect)

The climate was already getting colder because the northern hemisphere was heading for the Little Ice Age. At the same time agricultural land was taken out of production in Europe because of the 25-40% decline of the European population.
This means ploughing of less ground, which releases greenhouse gasses (Methane and carbonates) and forest clearance was reversed. More trees and scrubs mean that more carbon (CO2) was taken out of the atmosphere and stored in biomass. The abandoned farmland acted as a significant carbon sink because trees store carbon taken from the CO2 in the air.
To me the writer is tripping and just has no idea of the tiny scale of European mankind's impact at that time compared to much much bigger impact of global nature

Feb 1, 2019 at 12:17 PM | Registered Commenterstewgreen

There are many unknowns here. It is very speculative.

To begin with it needs to be shown that natural re-forestation does absorb more CO2 than agriculture. Pre-Columbian agriculture was not backwards. They even had hydroponics around what is now Mexico City. I'm guessing that that didn't re-forest.

Black Soil is an artificially fertilised soil that boosts agricultural output. Without people it doesn't get made. Less plant growth.

And trees grow slowly. Crops grow fast before being converted into faeces.

If the argument is that the population decline led to less breathing then that sounds reasonable, at first. But where people aren't other living things are. How many rodents and insects lived because people weren't there too keep the area tidy?

Finally, this all assumes that the diseases spread through the population quicker than the immigrants could travel. And that the native population was 95% vulnerable to Old World diseases. That is only 'one in 20' was able to fight off these new diseases that have evolved away from what they were like before the natives reached the Americas.
Possible but speculative. It may be that there were other reasons why the native populations were particularly vulnerable.
Yes, I suggest that the climate aided the spread of disease not the other way round.
Speculative again? Perhaps. But that has been seen elsewhere in history. The weakened folk at the end of WW1 suffered badly from the flu.
This new theory is a one-off unique occurrence that is inferred not observed.

Feb 1, 2019 at 1:01 PM | Registered CommenterM Courtney

I think the Maunder Minimum is still the most likely explanation for the LIA. I accept readily that European diseases wiped out vast number of (mostly South) American natives, but the 95% population loss over the period referred to does seem extraordinary, even so.

Nevertheless, I will take a look at the paper when I get a minute.

Feb 1, 2019 at 3:07 PM | Unregistered CommenterMark Hodgson

As a born and bred Country Bumpkin, with some practical understanding about the natural world and environment, I do remember concerns about the destruction of the Amazonian Rainforest from the late 70s - early 80s(?) They made sense to me then, plus the fact that rainforest soil is not naturally rich in nutrients, as they are washed out by the rain, leading to slash and burn agriculture. The concept of trees, woods, forests and rainforests being part of the lungs/respiration of the planet still makes sense.

That is why I did initially believe in Mann's Hockey Stick.

Cutting down more trees than will regrow naturally, has ALWAYS been man's way, since livestock and arable farming took over from hunting and gathering on the various continents at various different times.

With individual tree species being culled for specific engineering uses, shortages of Yew for English Longbows caused the Tudors to import from Italy.

The shortage of oak for shipbuilding and big construction projects aroused concern in Pepys Diary., and continued until warships were made of iron c1860. Much of Western Europe wa deforested over a similar period, but the industrial mining of coal meant that the use of wood as fuel reduced.

Traditional US and Canadian steam locomotives have much larger, and more elaborate "chimneys" because they used wood for fuel, and travelled through combustible scenery
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimney_(locomotive)#Spark_arrestors
"Spark arrestors
Locomotives built in Great Britain, where coke was the most common fuel, often used chimneys of cast iron, as they lasted longer than chimneys fabricated from sheet metal. Early North American locomotives often used wood fuel; and large numbers of glowing embers were carried through the boiler and out of the chimney by high velocity exhaust steam.[4] Spark arrestors became a common feature of wood-burning locomotive chimneys to reduce the number of fires started by escaped embers. The difficulty of casting complex spark arrestors encouraged fabrication of sheet metal chimneys for wood-burning locomotives."

The UK ran out of tmber during WW1, and the Forestry Commission was set up in 1919, since then, vast areas of conifers have been planted, that with their acidic run-off caused a detectable rise in the acidity of rivers and the acid rain scam.

A good sized and healthy balance of trees is part of the ecology of the planet. They absorb some of the imbalances, whether man made or natural. Concerns about trees being the lungs of the planet, ignored salt and freshwater algae and other aquatic weeds.

Feb 1, 2019 at 3:39 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

Further thought, consider Easter Island.
It has big heads. That's all most people think of when they hear of Easter Island. Yet when the Westerners first reached Easter Island the big head making civilisation had already disappeared.

Something else had caused that collapse. To me this points at an environmental change that preceded western interference. Could that have been caused by western contact with South America? Perhaps, but it doesn't explain why the disastrous fatalities didn't occur on that small island when we did reach it.

Or maybe China crossed the Pacific and forgot to write it down.

Feb 2, 2019 at 7:25 AM | Registered CommenterM Courtney

M. But Easter Island can be used to support the hypothesis of depopulation by the introduction of Europeans. The main depopulation, it is true, occurred before European contact and as a result of deforestation (human caused or by rats), but there were still several thousand people living on the island when contact occurred. Almost complete depopulation occurred as a consequence of nineteenth century introduction of smallpox and by slavers.
I use Diamond's other book "Collapse".

Feb 2, 2019 at 8:04 AM | Unregistered CommenterSupertroll

The population crash prior to Europeans turning up at Easter Island has kept many environmentalists and prophets of doom employed for 100+ years.

I am inclined towards those theories that include collapse of food production, and the natural flora, plus tribal conflict. The coastline does not lend itself to the launch and retrieval of boats for fishing, assuming they had the materials to build boats.

Feb 2, 2019 at 3:49 PM | Unregistered Commentergolf charlie

Some may enjoy reading this
https://peopleofonefire.com/mass-deaths-of-native-americans-caused-the-little-ice-age-fact-check.html

Feb 4, 2019 at 8:05 AM | Unregistered CommenterSupertroll