Buy

Books
Click images for more details

Twitter
Support

 

Recent posts
Recent comments
Currently discussing
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace
« Instalanche | Main | The Monckton show »
Monday
Jan312011

More Delingpole

David Allen Green is very upset that I suggested he was trying to pressure Delingpole into doing another interview. I'll check over my sources now. It's possible I got the wrong end of the stick.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (58)

Frosty:
Think of it as a Laxative for your purse! Maybe even in the category of an Enema to flush your earnings!

Jan 31, 2011 at 1:39 PM | Unregistered CommenterMike Davis

Totally OT

Reading in the Sunday Times about the proposed sell-off of Forestry Commission land. Relatively tiny amount of money for the Treasury, all a bit baffling. Then this:

Despite the commercial opportunities, ConFor [Confederation of Forest Industries] has its own concerns. It believes that the big winners from any sale would not be timber companies but energy groups who could reap large subsidies under the government's agenda to encourage renewable energy, for burning the wood as biofuel.

Suddenly this rather weird proposal makes sense. A spot of judicious lobbying here and there by canny subsidy-harvesters, an avowed energy fantasist in the form of Caroline Spelman pushing a 'green and clean' generation agenda...

Another green energy scam in the making, I'd say.

Jan 31, 2011 at 1:43 PM | Unregistered CommenterBBD

BBD,

So lets see if Ive got this right...if an old oak falls over on my property and I go to chop it up for firewood Ill have the local council coming down on me harder than a fit chick on a full smarty packet! Yet here we have thousands of acres of land purposely being sold off so that energy companies can cut the trees down to burn them as biofuel??

WTF gives with that!

Mailman

Jan 31, 2011 at 2:15 PM | Unregistered CommenterMailman

Perhaps energy companies have another option possibly not available to the government: claiming carbon credits for NOT chopping the trees down (which can then be sold on at a profit). Not sure if I have the mechanism right here ...

Jan 31, 2011 at 2:52 PM | Unregistered Commentermatthu

Bishop Hill,

What am to do? I have been asked to "stop" - so I did.

But still the comments and the name-calling continues. And now I am even being called a hypocrite...

Please advise.

[David. I apologise again for this. I have deleted all the comments that refer to you after my final cease and desist request.]

Jan 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM | Unregistered CommenterDavid Allen Green

matthu

Yes, I've an idea that you can set up as a 'carbon sink' and get subsidies for that too, but I'm not so sure of the detail either.

However, I have a suspicion that the conversion of public space into private subsidy farms biofuel resources is the more lucrative option.

Jan 31, 2011 at 3:29 PM | Unregistered CommenterBBD

matthu.

Not another version of not pig farming surely?

http://www.fmft.net/archives/004255.html

Jan 31, 2011 at 3:44 PM | Unregistered CommenterPhillip Bratby

I am very saddened by commenters' failure to respond to a request to lay off. I'm closing the thread down.

Jan 31, 2011 at 4:18 PM | Registered CommenterBishop Hill
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.