Unthreaded
@stewgreen, Sep 2, 2017 at 10:51 PM
@PCar this is not made up
Today's BBCWoman's Hour Princess Diana and her impact on black womenSo BBC Woman's Hour is saying your reaction to Princess Diana depends upon your skin colour
...em that's RACISM
BBC.R4.Woman's.Hour.Princess.Diana.And.Her.Impact.On.Black.Women.DAB-Pcar
BBC Feminist PC self-affirming "debate" with no dissenters - typical BBC biased breach of charter unbalanced broadcast.
BBC: Why did she have a particular appeal to black women?
Black USA Woman: She was a Disney [like] Princess...and was bad
...
BBC: A Victim of her husbands infidelity [privately/discretely with Camilla only]
Pcar: What about Diana's? She behaved like a slut and had public flings/sex with multiple men before and after divorce.
...
BBC: Who has replaced her [Diana]
Woman: Nobody
Pcar: Thank you God, one was more than enough
...
BBC: Nation was crying/grieving
No it wasn't Mrs Pcar, Pcar, Pcar's mum, my friends... were not. We were looking at them saying "you're mawkish behaviour is insane" - now it has a description: Grief Whore.
.
Opportunity missed: fasten seatbelt to survive crash, or die like Diana did. Bodyguard fastened seatbelt and only survivor.
.
Was Diana the first snowflake?
DuckDuckGoed "USS Liberty attack"
Picked the below link to read first.
https://climateaudit.org/2017/09/02/email-dates-in-the-wikileaks-dnc-archive/
Yesterday, Scott Ritter published a savage and thorough critique of the role of Dmitri Alperovitch and Crowdstrike, who are uniquely responsible for the attribution of the DNC hack to Russia. Ritter calls it “one of the greatest cons in modern American history”. Ritter’s article gives a fascinating account of an earlier questionable incident in which Alperovitch first rose to prominence – his attribution of the “Shady Rat” malware to the Chinese government at a time when there was a political appetite for such an attribution. Ritter portrays the DNC incident as Shady Rat 2. Read the article.My post today is a riff on a single point in the Ritter article, using analysis that I had in inventory but not written up. I’ve analysed the dates of the emails in the Wikileaks DNC email archive: the pattern (to my knowledge) has never been analysed. The results are a surprise – standard descriptions of the incident are misleading.
On Saturday FOOC
"Harriet Constable, who reports from Kenya on the increasingly violent and costly incidence of sand harvesting"
She seemed to think that there is going to be a world shortage of sand
I thought I heard her going on about Chinese villages having no water , cos all the sand had been taken from the river bed and the water disappeared cos there was now nothing to hold it , just "bare bedrock"
..though I see the blurb claims she was talking only about Kenya
............
ah yes she has a BBC Magazaine piece also
"Sand is infinite, surely. And yet the world is running out."
About Dubai, she claims they get sand from Australia : "The irony: sand has become such a precious commodity it is literally being sold to the Arabs"
The long piece ends
"While I watched and wondered whether sand could soon become the stuff of distant childhood memories, others around me had more pressing concerns.
For them, sand could mean the difference between eating and going hungry, whether they'd have drinking water or not, or whether they'd ever see their loved ones again."
bit dramaqueeny ?
....................
Ha look how in August she (& Rachel Reed) sold the same story and photos to aljazeera.com here
How much did the French pay when they left NATO ?
Sep 3, 2017 at 7:43 PM by Pcar
A smart meter is smarter than the account holder.
@stewgreen, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:19 PM
Pg 85 Mail on Sunday - Smart Meters plain Dumb ... Costs each household £420 ...£10 gain - ..and hackable
Pg 85 Mail on Sunday
Smart Meters plain Dumb
... Costs each household £420 ...£10 gain
..and hackable
stewgreen
I heard a Radio 4 interview Saturday morning on the topic. Some karma would be nice.... Utterly indefensible partisan point scoring and wholesale obstruction and misdirection is what I heard The Today program team is truly loathsome and beneath contempt.
If only some of the presenters / editors / producers / researchers were subjected to the consequences of their antics.....
11:12 PM | clipe
Thanks for that link to climateaudit.
The stink from the Democrats isn't diminishing is it? So they found "the leak" but didn't actually stop it .... and blamed it on "doze wikkid wushins" - way to go eh?
The MSM for the most part would not I think have let the Repuplicans escape as lightly. The FBI's Comey exonerating Hillary *before* interviewing her *and* without actually inspecting the server at issue looks to be being studiously ignored in the meejah - who it seems to me aren't keen at all to distinguish between the various escapes of damaging information from the Democrat camp and their cronies.