Buy

Books
Click images for more details

The extraordinary attempts to prevent sceptics being heard at the Institute of Physics
Displaying Slide 2 of 5

Twitter
Support

 

Recent comments
Why am I the only one that have any interest in this: "CO2 is all ...
Much of the complete bollocks that Phil Clarke has posted twice is just a rehash of ...
Much of the nonsense here is a rehash of what he presented in an interview with ...
Much of the nonsense here is a rehash of what he presented in an interview with ...
The Bish should sic the secular arm on GC: lese majeste'!
Recent posts
Links

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Entries in Bureaucrats (140)

Tuesday
Jan062009

Privatising the state

...but not in the way any sane member of the public would want. Ian Parker-Joseph, writing at the Libertarian Party blog, has a very interesting post about the bureaucracy setting up private companies (limited by guarantee) to perform work that you or I would expect to be state-run. The examples he gives are the Association of Chief Police Officers and SOLACE (Society of Local Authority Chief Executives and Senior Managers).

As Ian PJ points out, SOLACE advises on recruiting local authority chief executives and setting their salary levels. It includes several chief executives on its board, so there is a clear conflict of interest. As he says, it's a pretty clear case of racketeering.

One other interesting facet of this scandal which Ian doesn't pick up on is the fact that structuring these bodies outside the public sector makes them immune to Freedom of Information requests.

Handy, that.

 

Thursday
Mar272008

Government in miniature

Rumour reaches me of another government IT fiasco. Apparently the grandly-named Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care (SCRC) has created a shambles with its system for carers to report on how they're getting on.

Back in the good old days, childminders had a simple business relationship with their customers. If you had to go out to work, you probably found a friend or relative who had children of their own to look after and came to a mutually acceptable arrangement to have them look after your kids too. Money changed hands, and the child went to the childminder for as long as both parties were happy with the arrangement.

In Labour's brave new world, this is not allowed. If someone is going to accept money for childminding, they have to register with the bureaucracy and do as they are told. They have to fill in lots (that's LOTS) of forms, which need to be processed by a whole new bureaucracy set up for the purpose. Another lot of parasites bureaucrats will demand access to the childminder's home to inspect whether it meets the bureaucracy's definition of "suitable" and "safe" or not. They can demand any changes they want. If the cost is too high, that's tough. You can't be a childminder. If the parent has a different opinion on what is suitable and safe, that's irrelevant too. The bureaucracy has spoken. You may not hold opinions different to those of the state.

Now remember that childminding is not a well-paid job. So the result of the government's actions is almost certainly that there will be fewer childminders - who is going to want to go through all that pain, paperwork and cost just to earn a few extra quid a week? This effect is made worse by the fact that the government limits the numbers of children that a childminder can care for at any one time. Again, you have to wonder why they think that parents and childminder aren't felt to be sufficiently grown-up to make these decisions between them.

But that's not all. Every year, SCRC requires childminders to make an annual return. This seems to involve having childminders complete a whole lot more paperwork (it would do, wouldn't it?). There's a self-assessment form to be filled in by the childminder, there's surveys of parents so that they can waste their time too, and there's a new website to negociate. Quite why I, as a parent, have to tell somebody else whether I'm happy with the childminding service is beyond me. If I wasn't happy, why the hell would I send my child there? This isn't being done for my benefit is it?

So cui bono? It goes without saying that there is a whole new bureaucracy to look after the annual returns too. So the chief beneficiaries would appear to be the SCRC themselves. What a bunch of parasites.

Anyway, because they're bang up to date with all the latest interwebby stuff, the SCRC has decided that annual returns can be completed via a whizzy new website. Except that (and we might have expected this) it isn't whizzy at all. It has apparently fallen over big time, with childminders having spent literally days preparing data which has disappeared, apparently without trace, into the bowels of the computer. Apparently some carers have been reduced to dictating their returns to SCRC staff over the phone. These are the lucky ones, because apparently the phones are being diverted to answering machines now.

So we have a set of procedures that are not needed and a bureaucracy that nobody wants, all supported by a computer system that doesn't work.

Government in miniature. 

 

Tuesday
Jul172007

Clutter is dangerous

I picked up a glossy leaflet in the local sports centre the other day.

Clutter is dangerous - Tidy up! was the title, and it was brought to us by the combined eminences of Perth & Kinross council and NHS Tayside working under the umbrella of the Tayside Healthy Communities Project. The cover had a nice cartoon of somebody tripping over a book, watched by his muliticultural family.

This looked like pretty important stuff, so I read on:

Five Tips to Help Reduce the Risk of Falls

There's a lot to cover then. I had no idea standing up was so complex.

Take regular exercise

Huh? I would have thought that remaining safely ensconced in bed would be more effective.

Look after your feet and wear sensible shoes.

No more dressing up in ladies stillettos for me then.

Get your eyes tested regularly

So you can see the floor before it hits you, no doubt. 

Avoid rugs, loose carpet, and trailing flexes

Break dancing might be inadvisable too. 

Have plenty of light, put light on if up to loo at night

Doesn't everyone pee in the dark now? There's a planet to save after all.

Signing off, the authors (either the Falls Service Manager or the Falls Project Manager by the look of it) give us this final gem of advice.

"It's better to be safe than sorry" and "Pride comes before a fall". 

I'm speechless.

(Political note: Perth & Kinross council is run by a LibDem/SNP coalition - just so you know who to blame). 

Sunday
Jun242007

Have you got a licence for that sporran

What a terrific story! According to the BBC, the Scottish Executive has introduced legislation which will require owners of badger or otter fur sporrans to obtain a licence. Apparently, as these animals are protected now, they feel that they have to check that you obtained it at a time when it was legal to kill them.

You absolutely could not make up the cringe-worthy micromanagement nannying of the Scottish Political Classes.

SHO_001F.jpg 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Do you have a licence for that sporran, madam?"

Six months in prison or a £5,000 fine if you fail to comply.

 

Thursday
Mar292007

Love your children

Every child at my elder son's nursery has received a leaflet from the Scottish Children's Commissioner or somesuch. This masterpiece of state-sponsored tosh is to be passed on to their parents. It's a remarkable document. Try this for example:

Love your children 

  • Be affectionate, hug and kiss them
  • Tell them good things about themselves and others
  • They will feel more secure and learn how to treat others in a positive way

Who would have guessed it? I am now a new man and am now fully resolved to love my children. (I'm not sure about all that kissing though. Sounds most unhygienic). Or how about this:

 

Weapons are dangerous!

  • Never allow your children near weapons
  • Explain the dangers and consequences of using or carrying weapons
That puts paid to the baby's shotgun then. He will be disappointed.

 

The Scottish Children's Commissioner costs approximately £1 million every year. In their annual report we learn that some of this largesse has been lavished on:

development of the SCCYP website as a major interactive tool for communicating with children and young people.

And sure enough,  we find that the website has made it possible for small Scottish children to send poems and stories to their friendly neighbourhood bureaucrats. So far there have been two poems sent in, one called Fair Freedom and the other "Racist???". Unfortunately nobody has managed to send in any stories yet. Perhaps they're all busy on the discussion boards?

But there is no sign of Scottish schoolchildren flocking there either - the discussion board has now reached the sum total of eleven threads, on subjects as diverse as smacking and the minimum wage.

"Send in your suggestions", invites the SCCYP. Perhaps readers would like to oblige.
 

Page 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10