Seen elsewhere



Click images for more details

Recent posts
Recent comments
Currently discussing

A few sites I've stumbled across recently....

Powered by Squarespace

Select committee allocations

Spy Blog reports on the allocation of House of Commons Select Committee chairs to the different parties. Both the Environment and Science/Tech positions are to be filled by Conservatives.

Please let it not be Tim Yeo.


Our disingenuous man in San José

From, a newspaper in Costa Rica:


Here is some good news for the citizens of San José: in the future you are going to find your city a little quieter and the air less polluted and cleaner. Why? Because the Swiss and British ambassadors have just bought electric cars to use for routine trips in the city.

...[the cars], being electric, don't generate emissions.

That last bit ain't true, electric cars merely displacing emissions from the exhaust to the power station.


Huhne out?

A report on the Spectator website suggests that David Laws has resigned as chief secretary to the Treasury.

His successor is understood to be a Lib Dem, probably Chris Huhne or Jeremy Browne. ...getting Huhne out of the environment office may prove a blessing.

Yes indeed.


The Holocene optimum

Current temperatures are unprecedented? Not so says Matt Ridley:

A study of sea sediment cores in the Chukchi Sea shelf in the Arctic Ocean concluded that `during the middle Holocene the August sea surface temperature fluctuated by 5°C and was 3-7°C warmer than it is today.

Yes, you read that right: up to SEVEN DEGREES CENTIGRADE.

Read the whole thing.


Harrabin again

The attitude of the establishment to the sceptics shines through the succession of inquiries into controversial science at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU).

When at the launch of the Sir Muir Russell inquiry I asked about the credibility of the review panel in the blogosphere, Sir Muir dismissed the enquiry with the flick of a wrist - he had been a senior civil servant and he had run a university, his bona fides were beyond question.

But the blogosphere does not respect past reputations, only current performance. And some of the top performers in the blogosphere are critics of the establishment.

Read the whole thing.


Oz academy dust-up

Hot on the heels of the news that fellows of the Royal Society are arguing over their public position on climate change comes a report that the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering is engaged in a similar battle over how their views should be represented to the public.

A two-page draft [document], posted on a password-protected section of the academy's website, said the academy ''does not believe the science is settled'' regarding climate change.

It said many scientists believed ''climate changes are nothing unusual, based on past geological records''.

An exchange of emails shows the statement has sparked anger and alarm among members. More than 50 of Australia's top agricultural and environmental scientists are among those objecting to the statement. A letter signed by 12 climate scientists has also been circulated to members.

An alternative policy statement, drafted by academy member and Melbourne World Climate Research program director Professor Ann Henderson-Sellers, has been emailed to members.


Briggs writes to Santer

Matt Briggs writes to climatologist, Ben Santer. Very funny.


More coverage of Royal Society rebellion

The newspapers this morning have more coverage of the rebellion in the ranks of the scientific establishment.

Ben Webster in the Times names Sir Alan Rudge as the leader of the rebellion. Rudge is not naming the other signatories though. Webster notes Rudge's involvement in the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

Louise Gray in the Telegraph covers the story too.


The Royal Society rewrite in the news

The story that the Royal Society is going to rewrite its climate change position paper appears to be making something of an impact. Here are a few relevant links:

The Royal Society's statement about the background is here. Apparently the rewrite had been, ahem, planned for some time. There's also this:

Click to read more ...


Today on the Royal Society

BBC radio's flagship Today programme also covered the rumblings of discontent coming from within the Royal Society. The audio is here, starting just after 54 minutes.


The question of Gosselin

P Gosselin notes the rise in environmentalists demanding a suspension of democracy so that the wise ones in the green movement can put their ideas into practice. The BBC has apparently given them an episode of the Analysis programme to promote their views.

This idea raises a whole new concept of the environmentalists. No longer are they watermelons - green on the outside and red on the inside - they are something else - green on the outside and brown on the inside.

Gosselin wonders what kind of fruit this might be and can't come up with anything much. I think perhaps the word he is after is "pistachio".

It's a kind of nut.


Another climate review

Just back from London and things are hotting up nicely. Roger Harrabin has the big story of the day with the news that 43 fellows of the Royal Society have complained about the Society's climate coverage:

The UK's Royal Society is reviewing its public statements on climate change after 43 Fellows complained that it had oversimplified its messages.

They said the communications did not properly distinguish between what was widely agreed on climate science and what is not fully understood.

The society's ruling council has responded by setting up a panel to produce a consensus document.

This is pretty exciting stuff.


Tip jar again

I've switched on the tip jar again, in case anyone wants to contribute to the ongoing running of the site. All contributions gratefully received.


Global warming debate at Oxford

The SPPI blog has a report on a global warming debate from the Oxford Union starring three lords a-leaping - namely Lawson, Leach and Monckton. It sounds like good knockabout stuff...

Lord Monckton, a former science advisor to Margaret Thatcher during her years as Prime Minister of the UK, concluded the case for the proposition. He drew immediate laughter and cheers when he described himself as “Christopher Walter, Third Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, scholar, philanthropist, wit, man about town, and former chairman of the Wines and Spirits Committee of this honourable Society”. At that point his cummerbund came undone. He held it up to the audience and said, “If I asked this House how long this cummerbund is, you might telephone around all the manufacturers and ask them how many cummerbunds they made, and how long each type of cummerbund was, and put the data into a computer model run by a zitty teenager eating too many doughnuts, and the computer would make an expensive guess. Or you could take a tape-measure and” – glaring at the opposition across the despatch-box – “measure it!” [cheers].


DEFRA expenditure

Some time ago I got an analysis of the total expenditure of the Department for Schools Children and Families. Given the recent focus of this site on global warming and greenery, I thought it would be interesting to see what DEFRA (that's the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) had been spending the taxpayer's money on too.

I haven't got time to analyse this right now, but if you'd like to flag up anything interesting in the comments, feel free. The file is attached below.

DEFRA expenditure