Scientivism Media Centre on Bengtsson
May 16, 2014
Bishop Hill in Climate: Sceptics, Climate: sensitivity, Greens

The Science Media Centre has entered the fray on the Bengtsson affair, publishing one of its usual "expert reaction" pieces. Readers will recall that after the Oxburgh affair nearly every expert the SMC quoted was among those accused of wrongdoing regarding Climategate. It's a similar story today, with the SMC choosing to quote Bob Ward (an expert in what way?!), Myles Allen (who sits on the editorial board of the journal involved) and Simon Lewis, who can bring nothing to the party except a penchant for green activism. Only Tim Palmer might pass muster as a neutral.

This disclaimer at the bottom of the piece intrigued me:

Myles Allen is on the Editorial Board of Environmental Research Letters but played no part in the review of or editorial decisions on the Bengtsson paper.  He states: “I wasn’t even aware of it until yesterday, and still haven’t seen the paper — nor do I wish to see it, since rejected papers are meant to be kept confidential.”

Environmental Research Letters is the journal that is accused of rejecting Bengtsson's paper on political grounds rather than scientific ones, but it is better known as the organ chosen by John Cook for the publication of his infamous 97% consensus paper.

Take a look at ERL's editorial board:

It seems to me that Allen is the member of the board with expertise in climate sensitivity, the subject of Bengtsson's paper. It's therefore surprising to me that he wasn't even aware of the submission. I wonder which editor it was.

Article originally appeared on (http://www.bishop-hill.net/).
See website for complete article licensing information.