DPA magazine on Nullius in Verba
Mar 15, 2012
Bishop Hill in Royal Society

I had missed this editorial in DPA magazine, much of which concerns my GWPF report on the Royal Society.

Whether or not the scientific community can truly be insulated from political influence, particularly when its research is financed, in part, through public funding, is a moot point. However, institutions like the Royal Society must presumably speak with the majority voice of their members. If the consensus among scientists is that anthropogenic climate change is a reality, then calls for “drastic action on energy and climate policies from policy makers and governments” are to be expected from a responsible scientific body. More worrying is the possibility that the views of dissenters are not being given proper hearing for fear of opprobrium; this, rather than the broader accusation of political grandstanding, is probably behind Andrew Montford’s call for more “open-mindedness and balanced assessment”.

Read the whole thing.

Article originally appeared on (http://www.bishop-hill.net/).
See website for complete article licensing information.