I have recently obtained a new document under FOI. This is a briefing issued to civil servants at the Department of Energy & Climate Change on the subject of the first Science & Technology Committee inquiry into Climategate. The briefing is dated 31 March 2010.
I was particularly amused by the observation that the committee had found no evidence that Jones had subverted the peer-review process.
Given that they didn't look for evidence and simply took Jones' word for it, that's not very surprising, is it?