New S&T committee submissions

Sep 17, 2010
Bishop Hill in Climate: CRU, Climate: Oxburgh, Climate: Parliament, Climate: Russell

I the wake of the announcement of the reopening of the House of Commons Science & Technology Committee's investigations into Climategate, or at least into the UEA inquiries thereof, there have been a number of written submissions to the committee, which can be seen here.

• David Holland writes to complain about the way his submission to the Russell panel was mishandled.
• Doug Keenan points out that his fraud allegation was ignored
• Chris Huhne is still sticking to the "they were exonerated" line.

...and there is a lengthy submission from UEA. Notable features of this are:

There is some discussion of a non-existent allegation that Lord Oxburgh changed the terms of reference for his panel. This is not the concern. The concern is that Parliament was told that he would look at the whole of CRU's science, but he didn't. The blame for this appears to lie with UEA. The rest is very woolly.

Article originally appeared on (http://www.bishop-hill.net/).