Overall I was pretty pleased with that.  I think the programme gave a fair crack of the whip to both sides and I think the conclusions were pretty much correct for where we stand now.

A few minor gripes:

• having said that the Hockey Stick isn't central to the AGW debate, it would have been nice if they hadn't cut off the bit where I explained why it matters
• the evidence that the IPCC process was biased against sceptics was not mentioned
• some mention of the code and maybe the Harry readme would have broadened the perspective.

But for my first experience of mainstream media, I'm quite happy (apart from the fact they didn't mention the book!!).